The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 324 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I fully accept that point, but, although that gives flexibility to Government and public bodies to respond, the problem for practitioners on the ground is that they will then be uncertain about what could happen in any given situation. There is no way you can ever set everything out in a bill, but that takes us back to the point about relationships. Stakeholders and businesses must be clear about what NatureScot’s intentions might be. Does that make sense?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Excellent—that was going to be my follow-up question. I am not necessarily expecting you to be able to give a comment on that right now, because the bill was only introduced on Monday, but I presumed that you might have had conversations in the background. The point is that we have been hearing that some public bodies need a bit more detail about what exactly you are looking for them to do. That could be in the bill. You said that you would take the point away. Will you give a commitment to write to the committee to let us know what your thoughts are on that, so that we can understand your position?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Is this the right time for me to ask my question? [Laughter.]
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
If that is the case, would you give consideration to an amendment at stage 2 that would allow for a de-escalation to a control agreement from a control scheme if the land was sold to a new owner who—taking the goodwill approach that we have talked about this morning—wanted to work with NatureScot?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
There is no procedure for that in the bill, is there? However, you could introduce something that says that, after a certain amount of time—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Your advice is that people should make sure that they are carrying out deer management, so that they will not be selling their estate with a control scheme in place.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
What about the REACH example?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
That is not the intention of my question—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Hang on a second and I will bring up the right page.
Cabinet secretary, there was a consultation in 2024 in which you asked for information on what could be done to change what proposals could be made to change designated sites, but none of that really features in the bill. What are your thoughts on that consultation? Why did you not bring some of its discussion points into the bill?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Have I asked the wrong question, convener?