The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3050 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2026
Sue Webber
That is very fiscally prudent of you, commissioner. I am not going to disagree with your approach.
In your introductory remarks, you mentioned the increase in activity. It all sounds as if things are ramping up and that there is quite a lot of pressure on your office. What operational or budgetary challenges are you expecting over the next year, and how is your office planning to respond to them?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2026
Sue Webber
Can you share any specific examples of that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2026
Sue Webber
Commissioner, I want to ask about the funding that you operate with currently. You are fully funded by the SPCB, but I see that there was a decision to surrender £80,000 to the corporate body. How has not just the £97,000 underspend but the surrendering of that £80,000 to the corporate body impacted on your financial position over the past year? What has been the overall impact on you and how you function?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2026
Sue Webber
That helps with turnover and speeds everything up.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2026
Sue Webber
If the move to a 35-hour week is, as you said, the equivalent of losing one full-time post, are you seeking to bring in another head?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2026
Sue Webber
Perhaps more people need to take a look at how you work, commissioner.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2026
Sue Webber
I have a question, minister. In England and Wales, they have found a compromise: they do not let prisoners vote unless they are released on a temporary licence. Why did the Scottish Government not seek some sort of compromise, such as that presented?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2026
Sue Webber
Yes. This instrument is also about prisoner voting—these people are still detained.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2026
Sue Webber
I have a statement that I want to make later. Is that okay, convener?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2026
Sue Webber
I do, convener.
I will not be supporting this SSI today, because of my party’s long-standing opposition to allowing prisoners to vote, regardless of the circumstances of their incarceration. Individuals who are imprisoned as a result of breaking the law should not be able to vote, and I would extend that view to prisoners in the general population, not just those in mental hospitals.
I would also remind the committee of a number of cases of prisoners convicted of serious offences being given relatively lenient sentences due to the soft-touch justice guidance implemented by the Scottish National Party. As a result of that, we might be allowing individuals convicted of such serious offences to participate in our democracy.
The capacity of individuals detained on mental health grounds needs to be considered, too. Indeed, the Royal College of Psychiatrists in Scotland has said that
“voting rights should not be contingent on additional, specific assessments of capacity”.
At the very least, the committee should be given more detail on how capacity to vote will be assessed.
We have frequently been told that we need to allow prisoners to vote in order to comply with the ECHR. I think that, at this point, my position on the ECHR will be clear to the committee, but it is also worth highlighting the fact that the convention itself does not require prisoners currently serving custodial sentences to be given the vote, as is the case in Scotland. In England and Wales, a compromise was made, whereby prisoners released on temporary licence were permitted to vote, yet the SNP made no attempt to reach such a compromise here.
In summary, I do not think that the public elected any of us to enfranchise prisoners, and we do not need to agree to this SSI to comply with the ECHR. For those reasons, I will be voting against it today.