Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 31 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2843 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Sue Webber

If the CPG on deafness was to include visual impairment, there might be an obligation on the organisations that attend the CPG on visual impairment—such as the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association and the Royal National Institute of Blind People—to attend the other CPG as well, and it might also put more pressure on small charities and people who are interested. I know that the CPG on visual impairment is doing some specific work with Stuart McMillan, its convener, which I have been involved in through my work on floating bus stops. We are aware of their impact on deaf people and people with visual impairments.

I am really concerned by the prospect of expansion, and I recommend being a bit more firm, convener.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Sue Webber

I am happy with that.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Sue Webber

We already have a CPG on visual impairment, and we have many discussions in this room about duplication of CPGs’ work. If the group is seeking to expand its remit, I suggest that the groups perhaps consider merging.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Sue Webber

I suppose that that comes under the point about the administrative burden and who would be responsible for doing all the education and communication, and for engaging with the electorate to make them aware. That all comes at a cost, including from the point of view of the time and effort involved.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Sue Webber

I have a quick question. Given that regional MSPs are predominantly elected on a party basis, what are your thoughts—you have just alluded to this—on the suggestion that a recall petition could also be triggered when an MSP changes political party?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Sue Webber

I am happy for you to do it.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Sue Webber

You would want one rule for everyone.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Sue Webber

Mr Simpson, how do you respond to the concerns that have been expressed to the committee about the financial and administrative burden of the proposed regional recall petition process, as well as to some of the voter confusion issues that have been raised and put to us?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Sue Webber

Yes, and I know that Ms Roddick might talk about that later.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Sue Webber

Circling back to the regional list, we are elected because of the party and, as you said, nobody really knows who is on that list or their ranking. Some might say that how that happens is quite a dark art.

When people have voted for a party and never once for an individual—they have only ever voted for the party that is on that second part of the ballot that has so many of us in it—can you not see why there needs to be a clear and straightforward mechanism when someone comes off that list because they have switched party?