The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2843 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Sue Webber
If the CPG on deafness was to include visual impairment, there might be an obligation on the organisations that attend the CPG on visual impairment—such as the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association and the Royal National Institute of Blind People—to attend the other CPG as well, and it might also put more pressure on small charities and people who are interested. I know that the CPG on visual impairment is doing some specific work with Stuart McMillan, its convener, which I have been involved in through my work on floating bus stops. We are aware of their impact on deaf people and people with visual impairments.
I am really concerned by the prospect of expansion, and I recommend being a bit more firm, convener.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Sue Webber
I am happy with that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Sue Webber
We already have a CPG on visual impairment, and we have many discussions in this room about duplication of CPGs’ work. If the group is seeking to expand its remit, I suggest that the groups perhaps consider merging.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Sue Webber
I suppose that that comes under the point about the administrative burden and who would be responsible for doing all the education and communication, and for engaging with the electorate to make them aware. That all comes at a cost, including from the point of view of the time and effort involved.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Sue Webber
I have a quick question. Given that regional MSPs are predominantly elected on a party basis, what are your thoughts—you have just alluded to this—on the suggestion that a recall petition could also be triggered when an MSP changes political party?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Sue Webber
I am happy for you to do it.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Sue Webber
You would want one rule for everyone.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Sue Webber
Mr Simpson, how do you respond to the concerns that have been expressed to the committee about the financial and administrative burden of the proposed regional recall petition process, as well as to some of the voter confusion issues that have been raised and put to us?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Sue Webber
Yes, and I know that Ms Roddick might talk about that later.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Sue Webber
Circling back to the regional list, we are elected because of the party and, as you said, nobody really knows who is on that list or their ranking. Some might say that how that happens is quite a dark art.
When people have voted for a party and never once for an individual—they have only ever voted for the party that is on that second part of the ballot that has so many of us in it—can you not see why there needs to be a clear and straightforward mechanism when someone comes off that list because they have switched party?