The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1305 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
What if we bring in the measure only for the most serious offenders? It sounds as though we are already monitoring the most serious domestic abuse offenders under MAPPA anyway. What would be the problem with introducing that through the bill? Last week, Dr Forbes referred to offending levels by the top 2 to 3 per cent of perpetrators. If we were to bring in the measure, what would be the problem with using the current system?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
We also received evidence from COPFS, which raised the concern that it is currently unclear what proportion of domestic abuse offenders are subject to MAPPA notification requirements. We know that some domestic abuse offenders are subject to MAPPA, but it is unclear how many. Are there issues with data collection and monitoring? If there was work to improve data collection for the current systems would there be less concern around the notification scheme under the bill, because we would have a better idea of how many people are under MAPPA?
Are you able to you tell us how many domestic abuse offenders are currently being monitored by MAPPA?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
Is that something that you could work with the member on? We have said that it is complicated—I understand that. My colleague Pauline McNeill will ask more questions about risk. If we tighten up the measure, and given that we are already monitoring some domestic abuse offenders under MAPPA, why could we not use the current system for that purpose?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
I know that questions are coming on risk, so I will leave it at that just now.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
The bill as drafted proposes to introduce notification requirements for domestic abuse offenders who are sentenced to at least 12 months’ imprisonment in solemn proceedings.
The committee has heard that there are existing frameworks in place, such as MAPPA, through which some domestic abuse offenders will already be subject to notification requirements. However, the bill aims to fix gaps that have been identified in the frameworks. Could the notification system, specifically for the most dangerous offences, make a difference in cases and catch individuals who fall through the gaps in existing systems?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
You mentioned a lot of figures there. Do you have a specific figure to tell us how many domestic abuse offenders are actually under MAPPA?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
You do not. We would need to improve the data collection to get that figure.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
This is my last question. Police Scotland said that it was a bit concerned about the measure being too bureaucratic, but if we tighten up which offenders to include and sufficiently align the notification system with existing arrangements, such as MAPPA, would that address that concern?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
You want there to be a higher threshold. Even if people who have committed such serious offences do not plead guilty in advance, would there not be more evidence in those cases to get a guilty verdict?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Sharon Dowey
So, there needs to be more detail on how it would work.