The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 895 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Tess White
Good morning, cabinet secretary. I have two questions. First, you talked yesterday to some of the witnesses who came before the committee. When we heard from stakeholders, they were fairly unanimous that the bill will create conflict between parents and children. Such conflict could be one of the bill’s unintended consequences. It is almost as though the state is stepping in when—as, I think, you said yourself—headteachers manage that nuance all the time. Why should the state step in when it is not a problem for headteachers?
10:30Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Tess White
That is not the point. The point is that nobody can see why we are doing this. In the past few weeks, we have heard from witnesses such as the Church of Scotland, the Scottish Catholic Education Service and the Scottish Human Rights Commission, and we are all scratching our heads about this.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Tess White
Will you be giving extra support to headteachers to manage the situation when conflicts arise and students have to be given additional support?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Tess White
Cabinet secretary, the committee is spending a huge amount of time—and you are here today—looking at a technicality. The sample size is so small, and we are doing a huge piece of work on a bill that is going through Parliament when none of the witnesses have said that there is a problem. It just seems as though we are using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Tess White
As a committee, we will go through stage 1 of the bill and produce a report, so we will have to make decisions. To date—last week and today—we have not heard anybody say that they are in favour of the bill. We are hearing words such as “weeds” and “holes”, which is alarming.
I will ask my question on part 2 of the bill. What are your views on the Scottish Government’s reasoning for the further exemption to the compatibility duty? I ask Gina Wilson to respond first, then Juliet Harris and Gavin Yates, and I will bring in Louise Church last.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Tess White
It is part of the issue when you want more reporting. It would take a lawyer to unravel what you have just said. However, when there is a conflict between a parent and a child, they will have to go through the legal system and find a legal aid solicitor, which is almost impossible. You have confirmed my concerns, because you want more reporting, but the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities says that no inventory of what exists is in place. The bill would be bad lawmaking. I think that I have reached capacity on that one.
Juliet, would you like to answer the question about stage 2 in a very simple way that we can understand?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Tess White
Do you have any views on the approach being taken in part 2 of the bill? We heard some really strong views on that last week and we have heard some strong views this morning, too. Do you have any additional thoughts on that? Susan, I am looking at you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Tess White
My question is on part 2 of the bill, but I will come back to Juliet Harris before I ask that. I do not know whether our role is to mend holes in webs, and the hodgepodge of law making is a huge problem. This is one of the questions that we explored last week. Why should we not recognise that this is a hodgepodge? We should not start off here; we should wait for the human rights bill and incorporate it all in that. You are nodding. Will you address that point before I ask for your views on part 2 of the bill?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Tess White
I go back to something that Gavin Yates said about access to justice and the bill creating more harm. One area that the committee is exploring is the huge issues with legal aid, mainly for women who are suffering from domestic abuse. What will happen if we enter this realm as well and implement the bill, with its issues of the balance of rights between the parent and the child, and the child having to be a certain age and have the capacity to access legal aid? There is no access to legal aid for those children. Gavin, I go back to your point about the bill causing more harm than good if there is no access to justice.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Tess White
Louise, that was a brilliant summary. Thank you for that.