The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1719 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning and thank you for joining us. I thank Douglas Hutchison for clearly articulating what I think we have heard from every panel, and probably every individual witness, since we started our scrutiny of the bill, on the distinction between religious observance and religious and moral education. That has come through loud and clear. We have to deal with the bill that is in front of us, so we are talking about both aspects, but we all get the need to separate them, so I will take that as understood.
I am interested in hearing views from both of you on how things are currently working, on levels of awareness of the right to withdraw and on how schools and teachers deal with potentially awkward conversations. I come to Susan Quinn first.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. From the point of view of young people and their families, in your experience and from speaking to other teachers, have young people been reluctant to approach a member of staff, because they do not want to be stigmatised, othered or marked out as different? Do you see othering and stigmatisation as a potential issue in how the system currently works?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
I put the same question to Douglas Hutchison. From your point of view, how is the current system working? What are some of the challenges or pitfalls?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
It might, however, be an issue if there were one individual, rather than that clear community with a strong identity. From what we heard last week, people are perhaps unwilling even to raise the issue for fear of stigmatisation or othering. However, that is not your experience.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Louise Church, I have the same kind of question for you. In your experience and that of your MSYP colleagues, and from your general discussions, how are arrangements working in schools at the moment? You are closer to having been through school than any of us in the room, so I am keen to get your thoughts and views.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
On the last point that you made, what would a good process that is not intimidating look like? What would that feel like for young people?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Picking up on what you said, I have two connected follow-up questions. You have framed the issue in terms of resourcing, and there is genuine concern about what the proposal means for how schools deal with such things. Would it be helpful if we quantified things, if we had better data and if we had a better understanding of how many parents, young people and families could be affected, so that that could be used as evidence to request further resources?
I ask because, at the moment, we do not collect such data. There is no regularised or standardised mechanism—even in schools, as we understand it, never mind across local authorities or across the country. Is there a role for better data collection?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
On the first panel, it was suggested that there has never been a thematic review of religious observance in schools, and certainly not recently, although it may well have been done prior to the 1980 act. Would ADES support or consider a review, given what you have said about the removal of the requirement for RO in non-denominational schools?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
From your experience, is there a systematic way of recording withdrawals from RO or RME? Are you aware of schools collating data on that in a standardised way?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
In that small number of schools, or elsewhere, are you aware of any questions or concerns that parents, young people or teachers have observed around the stigmatising or othering of young people if their parents withdraw them?