The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1829 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, everyone. I am deputy convener of the committee and an MSP for the North East Scotland region.
While I have the microphone, I also want to declare an interest. Carolyn Scott and I worked together in my previous role at the Scottish Council on Visual Impairment prior to my being elected.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Thanks very much, Karen. Hello again, everyone, and thank you for joining us.
The first theme that I want to explore is access to assessments and any treatment or medication that comes after. How long did you have to wait to get an assessment, and what impact did that have on you, from your experience?
I do not know who wants to pick that up first. Debbie, I saw you nodding. Do you want to go first?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
I think that Kadie wanted to come in.
11:00
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Thank you all very much for sharing your personal experiences.
Leo Starrs-Cunningham and Rachel Parker talked about support or appropriate adjustments and accommodations. I would like to open up a discussion on that. What are the kind of things that you know work? Obviously, they will not necessarily be the same for everybody in different situations, but what are the kind of things that you know work and that we should be thinking about more generally across society, so that there is the awareness and understanding that Carolyn Scott indicated are so lacking in some healthcare professionals?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Thanks very much. Do you have anything to add, Leonie?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Thank you, Sofia—that is a helpful point to hear.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Thank you, Debbie. Rachel, do you want to come in on this?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Thanks very much for that, Kabie. I do not know if you could see, but there were a lot of people around the table nodding as you were speaking. What you were saying clearly speaks to other people’s experiences as well.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
I will hand back to the convener now but I thank you all for your answers to that question.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Maggie Chapman
Good morning to you both. Thank you for being here today and for the detail in your report.
I am interested in a couple of different areas, one of which is diagnosis and its value. We have heard clear evidence that shows that having some kind of diagnosis of neurodivergence, whether that is of autism or ADHD, gives people something from which to work; it is validating and gives them something that they can explain to people. That leads me to two questions: how can we ensure that people without a diagnosis are still supported, and what can be done about the long waiting times for any kind of medical assessment? Some people are waiting years for a diagnosis. Those are two quite different questions, but I would be interested to hear your thoughts about how we can deal with the issue of validation through diagnosis.