The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1714 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
You missed that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
Why did you deplete the university cash reserves with the amount of money that you spent, whether on capital or otherwise, and not use the revolving credit facility, as other institutions would do?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
Accountants have stressed that it was an incredibly unusual move that, when you knew that there was a problem in expenditure and income, you were continuing to use your cash reserves and depleting them rather than using the credit facility. It turns out that you probably could not have used the credit facility because of all the issues of covenant, but at no point did you ask why you were doing that rather than taking on long-term credit to ensure that you retained your cash position. That was a basic of the business. Did you not understand that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
That was in the report, though. It was not a case of the report not being produced; it had been sent to you all.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
Okay.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
I put on record, as I did yesterday, that I was previously employed at the University of Dundee. My time at the university overlapped with that of Professor Gillespie by perhaps three months. Earlier, you seemed to indicate that you were not happy when you were essentially asked to leave the university. Did you feel betrayed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
I am looking at how that relates to the budget, though. In June, you were told that you were modelling for a 25 per cent reduction, and other members of the executive said, “We should be looking at a reduction of at least 35 per cent”, but when the budget left that meeting, it continued on the basis of a 25 per cent reduction, did it not?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
What day was that? Can you give us even the month?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
It clearly was burning money and the building was alight at that point.
The character of the evidence that we have heard today is that you were a principal for the good times—a good-time Charlie—and, when the situation turned, you were completely inactive. You could not deal with it. You liked going abroad and being a credible face for the institution—Professor Gillies says that. However, when it came to the difficult decisions—the stuff that had to be done—you were just not interested, were you?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
Yesterday, we had an exchange with Jim McGeorge, who said that he also did not realise that the money had been spent. Peter Fotheringham said that it was a surprise to him that anybody did not know and that the university was never generating enough cash to spend on its fixed-assets programme.
The Gillies report makes clear that you and the chief operating officer were spending money hand over fist—it was flying out the door on staff and capital. You are smiling wryly, but it was a clear pattern of behaviour from you all.