The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 856 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Emma Roddick
The recall poll deals with a few issues that were raised at stage 1, but many of those issues were raised for both the constituency and regional elements. In relation to privacy, when someone signs a petition, everybody knows that they are trying to get rid of the MSP, whereas, in a poll, they would be voting one way or the other. Why did the member not opt to have a poll for both constituency and regional members, to even things out in that respect?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Emma Roddick
Why?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Emma Roddick
Will the member take an intervention?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Emma Roddick
Yes. I agree with Ruth Maguire. There is something really important here, but it is part of a wider piece of necessary work, and perhaps we will not be able to capture that in an amendment today.
Alex Cole-Hamilton mentioned the example of a young person getting work experience by working for an MSP. In my experience, such young people—they are sometimes children—are far more likely to spend the bulk of their time during that experience with our staff, who work on our behalf. I imagine that any effective move to better safeguard people in the parliamentary estate and constituency offices would need to include MSP staff.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Emma Roddick
In the other case, 10 per cent can trigger a whole by-election.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Emma Roddick
Many complaints might be made in bad faith or with the intention of getting somebody into trouble, but there might also be a legitimate basis to them. Is there a reason for your including both things in the amendment, instead of just ensuring that there is a legitimate basis for the complaint?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Emma Roddick
But in one case it is a first-past-the-post decision—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Emma Roddick
Good morning, cabinet secretary. I want to ask about the tree planting targets and the interaction with the Climate Change Committee’s recommendations. I note that the CCC specifically mentioned the figure of 22,000 hectares a year by 2036, but it seems from the draft climate change plan that the Government is taking a different approach. Can you speak to that and how that approach will meet the overall targets for planting?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Emma Roddick
Grand. Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Emma Roddick
I can do that, yes. I want to pick up on Dr Heath’s comments about protecting the cod. I understand the keenness to protect it as a specific species. Going back to your comments about the uniqueness of the Clyde, Dr Heath, I wonder whether there are wider implications around biodiversity or viewing the cod as an indicator of the health of other species in the area, which also makes it important.