The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3928 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Audrey Nicoll
A very good morning, and welcome to the fourth meeting in 2026 of the Criminal Justice Committee. We have received no apologies.
Our first item of business is a decision on whether to take item 5 in private. Do we agree to take that item in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Audrey Nicoll
Our next item of business is consideration of a negative Scottish statutory instrument. I refer members to paper 1, which sets out the purpose of the instrument.
I note that we have seen a number of such orders for the firefighters’ pension scheme in which the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee have picked up on issues relating to the drafting of the instrument. I very much hope that the Scottish Government is taking note of that.
As members do not wish to make any recommendations in relation to the negative instrument, do we agree that we are content for it to come into force?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Audrey Nicoll
Our next item of business is consideration of a proposal by the Scottish Government to consent to the United Kingdom Government legislating in a devolved area, as set by a proposed UK statutory instrument on the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation and North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission Privileges and Immunities Revocation Regulations 2026. I refer members to paper 2.
The purpose of the regulations is to revoke existing orders for these fisheries bodies that relate to privileges and immunities and to pave the way for replacing them with new orders in order to clarify privileges and immunities and to improve and maintain compliance with international law obligations.
Our role is to decide whether we wish to approve the proposal to consent to the UK SI. Do we agree to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Audrey Nicoll
That completes our consideration of agenda items in public. We move into private session.
10:05
Meeting continued in private until 11:03.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you, Ms Gosal. Certainly, there is no doubt about your passion and commitment to the bill. I will kick off with a broad question. As you will be aware, the majority of organisational evidence that the committee has heard reflects a lack of support, to be blunt, about the bill’s ability to achieve the aims that you have set out and that you are clearly passionate about. As succinctly as possible, what evidence do you have that the bill as drafted would achieve a reduction in domestic abuse offences, and reoffending in particular?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Rona Mackay before we move to questions on part 2 of the bill.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Audrey Nicoll
I will conclude that line of questioning.
For Ms Gosal’s benefit, I add that the practice across agencies that are responding to domestic abuse nowadays certainly does take into account the need to minimise trauma and, therefore, a lot of information sharing across organisations is done with consent. I share the concerns that Jamie Hepburn alluded to with regard to the risk that some of the data collection proposals in the bill might compromise trauma-informed approaches.
We move on to part 4, on school education, with questions from Katy Clark. Any other members who wish to ask questions on this theme can indicate that to the clerk.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Audrey Nicoll
The other part of my question related to the fact that existing processes do not necessarily require a criminal conviction for interventions to take place. Part 1 of the bill is obviously different in that regard. I am thinking back to Detective Superintendent Brown’s assertion that the fact that someone has a criminal conviction does not necessarily reflect the full or totality of the risk that someone may face. I am interested in your reflections on that point.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Audrey Nicoll
I am sorry, but I will have to close this down and draw a line under that questioning. We are very much over time, and I think that we have got the gist of the point about the variance in costing.
I thank our witnesses—Ms Gosal and her colleagues—for coming along to what has been a robust session, and we will now move into private session.
11:09 Meeting continued in private until 13:08.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Audrey Nicoll
Staying with questions on part 1 of the bill, I will bring in Jamie Hepburn, to be followed by Pauline McNeill.