Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 6 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 808 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

National Planning Framework 4: Annual Review

Meeting date: 24 June 2025

Alexander Stewart

Good morning. On 15 June, the chief planner wrote to authorities about the application of NPF4 policy 22, which concerns flood risk and water management. Why was it necessary for that letter to be sent? Following the issuing of the letter, what changes do you expect planning authorities and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency to make to how they assess flood risk?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

National Planning Framework 4: Annual Review

Meeting date: 24 June 2025

Alexander Stewart

Fiona Simpson, do you want to add anything to that?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

United Kingdom-European Union Summit

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Alexander Stewart

Good morning, cabinet secretary. The event was hailed as a massive success by the UK Government. The Prime Minister indicated that

“Britain is back in business”

with the EU.

As we heard, however, the reset involved huge difficulties and tensions with fisheries—you have gone into that, for which I thank you. We have also heard that there are opportunities with regard to defence and security, food and drink and energy co-operation. However, those are still just opportunities rather than agreements, because the member states still have to endorse or ratify some of them to ensure that they come into force.

What meaningful engagement would we expect from the Scottish Government and the UK Government on food and drink, energy co-operation and defence and security as we move forward? You explained some of the difficulties that you encountered with regard to fisheries. If there is a reset in those three areas that gives Scotland an opportunity, what is that opportunity and what kind of meaningful negotiation and engagement would you, as the Scottish Government, expect?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

United Kingdom-European Union Summit

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Alexander Stewart

Thank you. I will let others come in now.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

National Planning Framework 4: Annual Review

Meeting date: 17 June 2025

Alexander Stewart

It would be good to ascertain your attitude about the impact of the adoption of NPF4. There has been a plethora of associated working groups, guidance and advice. How has that affected the ability of communities to meaningfully engage with the planning system? Would you say that it has helped or hindered the development of local place plans?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

National Planning Framework 4: Annual Review

Meeting date: 17 June 2025

Alexander Stewart

You touched on the local development plans, so I will ask my second question. The committee has heard concerns that several LDP evidence reports have been rejected at the gate check and returned to planning authorities for further work. We are ascertaining why that is happening and what needs to change to ensure that planning authorities are submitting evidence reports that meet the requirements.

You have touched on the fact that some larger authorities have a large team of people working on the issue and smaller ones have only a small number of people doing so, but something must be fundamentally wrong, because even the larger ones are having their reports returned because there is a mismatch at the point of the gate check. It would be good to get a flavour of what you think of that.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4: Annual Review

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Alexander Stewart

Esme Clelland, do you want to add anything?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4: Annual Review

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Alexander Stewart

You have all touched on the issue of resourcing in relation to the size of some planning authorities and their recruitment and retention issues. Resourcing of planning departments has been a major concern, which we have heard from nearly everyone who has given us written views and evidence. What can be done to tackle the issue? Do any of you have views about the potential ring fencing of planning fee income? The idea has been mooted that that could support, assist or strengthen some of that work.

It would be good to get a flavour of where you stand on that proposal, because resourcing is a problem. There is a need to maintain and retain staff, and there is a need to ensure that authorities have the calibre of staff who are able to do what is expected of them in the required timescale. As I said, everyone who has given us views has expressed concern about that, so it is obviously a major problem for the sector and for the industry.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4: Annual Review

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Alexander Stewart

When local development plans were proposed, people felt enthusiastic about them. They thought that that was the right way forward, and they were quite involved in and elated by the whole process. As we have progressed, concerns been raised about the slow progress in producing many of those plans. When taking evidence, we have had reports that many plans are rejected when they get to the gate check that was put in place as an attempt to manage the plans.

How can we ensure that the adoption of those new plans is accelerated? There was enthusiasm about putting them together, but it seems that there are some issues when the plans get as far as the gate check and they do not necessarily progress. People then wonder what the point was and ask where they should go from there. How can we try to ensure that there is better acceleration of the process?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4: Annual Review

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Alexander Stewart

Thank you.