The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2558 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Clare Haughey
Amendment 252, in the name of Pam Duncan-Glancy, is grouped with amendments 253 and 276.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 1.
Amendment 52 disagreed to.
Amendment 193 moved—[Pam Duncan-Glancy].
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Clare Haughey
There will be a division.
For
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Harvie, Patrick (Glasgow) (Green)
Haughey, Clare (Rutherglen) (SNP)
Mochan, Carol (South Scotland) (Lab)
Whitham, Elena (Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley) (SNP)
Whittle, Brian (South Scotland) (Con)
Against
Sweeney, Paul (Glasgow) (Lab)
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The question is, that amendment 192 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Clare Haughey
There will be a division.
For
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Harvie, Patrick (Glasgow) (Green)
Haughey, Clare (Rutherglen) (SNP)
Mochan, Carol (South Scotland) (Lab)
Whitham, Elena (Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley) (SNP)
Whittle, Brian (South Scotland) (Con)
Against
Sweeney, Paul (Glasgow) (Lab)
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Clare Haughey
The question is, that amendment 189 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Clare Haughey
Thank you, Mr McArthur. That is now on the record.
I propose to close the meeting for this evening. At next week’s meeting, we will continue our stage 2 consideration of the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill.
Meeting closed at 20:44.Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Clare Haughey
I call Sue Webber to speak to amendments 253 and 276.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Clare Haughey
I seek absolute clarity on this, Mr Briggs. We are talking about GPs, which I can understand, but your amendment refers more broadly to medical practitioners, which might cover the situation of a palliative care doctor who is asked by a patient who is in a lot of pain, faces losing the ability to swallow or is at risk of suffocation, “What are my options?” Your amendment would give the medical practitioner the leeway to say, “These are your options: there is this medication or that medication, or you could look at this.”
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Clare Haughey
On Mr Harvie’s point about the sharing of information, subsection (4) in amendment 253 says:
“The Scottish Ministers must, by regulations, make provision for the publication and maintenance of a list of persons or bodies authorised to hold or communicate such information.”
Within that list, are you thinking about including universities that teach pharmacy, pharmaceutical companies, researchers and so on? I am keen to know who that part of the amendment is aimed at.