The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1264 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
I empathise with what has been said so far and the witnesses make compelling points. I want to return to some of the points that came up in answer to my colleagues’ questions, and to the points that the previous witnesses made about practicalities.
Do you have views on what facilities should be available for people to give evidence in? Where should those be? Does there have to be agreement with local authorities? For some people, giving evidence will need to be facilitated by the Crown, but do you see people giving evidence from their homes? Presumably not, from what you have said so far. It would be good for us to hear your thoughts on the practicalities, particularly given what we heard from the previous witnesses.
11:45Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
So, in such a situation, although the use of a photo would be appropriate in proceedings, you would want the original to be kept available until the conclusion of the trial.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
As the bill progresses, we could consider whether retention of the original thing, to use your phrase, should be a requirement until the conclusion of the trial process.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
So the issue is about both the suitability and the establishment of appropriate suites, to use your word, whether in defence firm offices or in a public sector setting such as—to use Mr Munro’s example—local libraries. There needs to be clear agreement and understanding, and then facilitation and resourcing of those facilities.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
And perhaps for some time thereafter, in case of an appeal.
Convener, do I have time to ask one more question?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Will you say that again, Mr Brown, as your microphone was off?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
How much time do you need to work through the challenges?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
I remind members of my entry in the register of members’ interests, which shows that I am registered on the roll of Scottish solicitors at the Law Society of Scotland.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
On the general issues that we have been discussing, part 1 of the bill sets out two new provisions that aim to support digital innovation in the criminal justice system. The first of those concerns the use of digital productions in criminal proceedings. Would you like to say anything further about those provisions? For example, are there any issues that you have not already raised that need to be resolved to ensure that processes work fairly and efficiently?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Moving slightly off that topic, the bill does not seek to make permanent the temporary provisions that currently extend some time limits in solemn cases. Do you have any views on whether the system is on track to be able to cope with pre-Covid time limits by November this year, when the temporary provisions are due to expire?