The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1659 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
Thank you. I would just like to pitch a slightly different question. Paul Campbell, you are here representing SAAB, which has essentially been scrapped. Has it been articulated to you what SAAB was not doing, or why it was not working, and therefore why it has been scrapped?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
Paul Campbell, I am going to come to you last, because I think that you will need to declare an interest in answering this question.
Sandy, can I pitch the same question to you? Given the importance of financial services, do you have clarity on where the inputs will be for industry? Do you think that there is sufficient interface with industry in the proposed structures?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
The renewables sector is probably facing the biggest change and needs the biggest increase in skills. Does Scottish Renewables have any clarity on where the industry voice will exist in the proposed new system?
10:45Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
Just finally, Paul, what are your top three or four things, to hit your Pareto point?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
I am going to come back and ask you what you think those things are, because I feel that you want to get them off your chest.
First, though, I will put my last proposition to you. We have heard quite a lot about the balance between the big employers and the SMEs. The big employers are overwhelmed with applicants, while SMEs struggle, sometimes, to engage with the system. Do we need more of a sectoral approach? I know, Paul Sheerin, that there have been some moves in that direction in advanced manufacturing, and likewise in construction, where we have long-standing collaborative bodies. Do we need more sectoral approaches to bring balance and help firms of different sizes engage with the system more effectively?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
Are there any other structural elements, such as the format of learning? How should we break down the problem in order to address the reskilling issue?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
I have a brief supplementary question. I want to break what has been said apart a little bit, and I will explain why. A few weeks ago, I spoke to a decorator apprentice who had started when he was 30. There is a structural problem, which you alluded to, in relation to funding and the format of learning, but that apprentice said that he had also found there to be a cultural issue in that everyone treats the apprentices as young lads, but he is not a young lad.
Do you agree that there are multiple strands? As well as the issues with structure and the format of learning, there might be some cultural elements. Are there any other strands to the reskilling challenge? It is really important that we pull apart all the details of what that challenge looks like.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
I will leave that there, convener, unless anyone else on the panel wants to respond.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
I find that interesting, because I think sometimes we treat skills as an alternative to academic things. From what you have just described, it is just a different blend of academic subjects, relative to the other things that you should be learning at school. Is that a fair summary?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Daniel Johnson
As an add-on—I know that this is a mild tangent, but I do not know where else I would throw this question in—do we also need to tease apart, a little bit, the technical and the vocational sides of things? I think that, sometimes, we say that something is either academic or skills based, and there is also a difference between practical hands-on learning and the applied theoretical side, which is technical. In other countries, they keep those three categories quite distinct. Is that something else that we need to think about? Do we need to make sure that, at school level, we are providing opportunities across those three areas, not taking some binary approach that sees just academic subjects and skills-based subjects?
Stevie, you seem to be nodding.