The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1659 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
Good morning, and welcome to the first meeting in 2026 of the Economy and Fair Work Committee. I wish everyone a happy new year. I believe that we are still in time to be doing such things.
This morning we start our evidence sessions on the draft climate change plan that the Scottish Government has published. Before we begin, I note that Kevin Stewart and Michelle Thomson from the committee are joining us online; Richard Woolley, who is one of our witnesses, is also appearing remotely.
We are joined by a panel of witnesses comprising: Professor Paul de Leeuw, director, Robert Gordon University Energy Transition Institute; Stacey Dingwall, head of policy and external affairs for Scotland, Federation of Small Businesses; David Thomson, chief executive, Food and Drink Federation Scotland; Professor Karen Turner, director, centre for energy policy, University of Strathclyde; and Richard Woolley, head of energy and climate change, Chemical Industries Association. I should note that Professor Turner is also joining us online.
Given the number of witnesses, I ask that in the first instance members direct questions to a particular member of the panel, but if other witnesses want to come in they should please try to catch our eye or indicate online.
I will open the questioning. When I think about the debate surrounding the previous climate change plan, I recall that there was considerable criticism that it was heavy on high-level targets and light on detailed implementation. That risked there being a lack of clarity on how things were meant to proceed. If we look at the figures on carbon reduction categorised by industry, we can see that there has been a 57 per cent reduction since 1990. However, that has been driven not by carbon initiatives but by deindustrialisation. Does the current draft plan represent a step forward in providing such detail, or are we risking further deindustrialisation in Scotland?
Given his broad expertise, I will bring in Professor Paul de Leeuw to open up the responses and to provide his observations.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
Stephen Kerr would also like to ask a supplementary.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
It is interesting that France has the lowest electricity costs in Europe, as I understand it. I believe that Karen Turner would like to come in, and then I will go to Richard Woolley with some specific questions.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
I think that Richard Woolley was hoping to come in.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Daniel Johnson
I will resume our questions by handing over to Stephen Kerr.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
Good morning, and welcome to the 36th meeting in 2025 of the Economy and Fair Work Committee. We are holding our final stage 1 evidence session on the Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill. We have received apologies from our colleague Murdo Fraser.
I welcome to the meeting Richard Lochhead, the Minister for Business and Employment, and his officials from the Scottish Government: Kieran Burke, bill team leader; Liam Hepburn, senior policy official; Fraser Gough, parliamentary counsel; and Emma Phillips, who is from the legal directorate.
I invite the minister to make a short opening statement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
My question was not really about whether we need to do that; that need is relatively clear, for exactly the reasons that you set out. My question was more about why the bill uses the term “rivalrous” rather than using language such as “exclusive control”. Was there a particular reason for using that novel term, which is certainly not in common usage, as opposed to using a slightly longer-form but plainer-language definition to cover the point that it belongs to one person who controls what happens to it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
With that, I bring in my colleague Sarah Boyack.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
I have a brief supplementary to that. Professor Robbie made a point about whether carbon credits should be specifically carved out in the bill. Her point was that, once you have created something as property, it makes it very difficult for the Government to exercise control, because of the nature of property rights.
I am certainly not expecting an answer this morning, but I would like to know whether the Government is reflecting on that specific point about carbon credits, given that it was raised by Professor Robbie.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Daniel Johnson
I am tempted to ask Mr Gough more questions about the karmic nature of the law, but I will resist that temptation.