The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1053 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
I was going to ask about the national panel but you have gone on to answer that, which is great. I was going to ask in particular about the Gypsy Traveller community, but you have given some details. In the interests of time, I will not go back over that, but are there any other groups that the national panel has particularly focused on?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
I welcome the work on the Gypsy Traveller community. I was on the Equalities and Human Rights Committee in the previous parliamentary session, when a lot of work was done on that. Alexander Stewart was on that committee, too.
I have a question on the perception of the panel. We have heard evidence that the panel can often feel one-sided. We were told:
“It is not a two-way process; it is not a dialogue or a conversation. It simply involves answering a survey.”—[Official Report, Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee, 3 December 2024; c 31.]
What would you say to that? Do you take on board that criticism? If so, do you have any plans to address it?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
My question is a wee bit different. I probably did not explain it right. The complainer should have a choice as to whether to give evidence in court or not, but do you ever come across a situation where a complainer would prefer to give prerecorded evidence or evidence on commission—in this example, it would probably be prerecorded evidence—but feel that they are more likely to be believed, for want of a better term, if they do it in court? My question was more about that. If that is an issue—we do not want to go back to the stage 1 evidence, as the convener will probably remind me, so I link the question to today’s discussion—could an amendment be lodged to address that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning to both witnesses. My question follows on from Sandy Brindley’s point about the evidence of vulnerable witnesses. The cabinet secretary has said that she proposes to lodge an amendment around the opportunity to give prerecorded evidence. What exactly would you like the amendment to say? What should it look like? It is an important amendment, which will come before us quite soon. It is important that we get it right—the sexual offences court will not work if it is a sexual offences court only in name; it must have all the right stuff around it.
Sandy, what should that look like, and where should the choices be for victims and witnesses? We were beginning to touch on that a minute ago.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Do you ever get an indication or feeling from the victims who you deal with that prerecorded evidence could be less effective, so it is important to give evidence in person? If that is the case—I am not sure whether you are going to tell me that you have found that, but I saw Sandy Brindley nod a wee bit—could an amendment to the bill be lodged to try to alleviate that concern?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning. This is giving me flashbacks to stage 1 and the enormity of the decision. As you heard earlier, it is clear that victims groups feel that moving to the proposed 10 out of 15 would be worse for victims. That is a compelling case, but we have heard another compelling case from you that other systems work effectively with near unanimity. Where do you think the Government got that suggestion? From a lay perspective, it feels like—I am sure that when the Government speaks to us about this, it will tell me that I am totally wrong—it is trying to please both points of view but is running the risk of not satisfying anybody. What is the thinking behind that, from a legal point of view?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
To go back to Rona Mackay’s question, is it such a bad thing? Could such a set-up have really negative consequences, or could it work and be a fair justice system? Do you know what I am getting at?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
You said something earlier, Simon, about the comparison of the conviction rates in Scotland and England. In England, there is a “better”—I put that in inverted commas—conviction rate. Is there a risk of Scotland’s not having a similar rate? Could having unanimity lead to more convictions and alleviate the concerns of victims organisations?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Fulton MacGregor
That is fair enough.