The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1049 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Thank you. I will not repeat the earlier discussion about how we get some of those good local initiatives to work on a more national basis, because that has been covered, but it I thought that it was important for the committee to hear what is going on in Lanarkshire. It sounds really good. As I said, I am an MSP for that area, so I was aware of some of that work.
My second question is around resources. Dr Hamilton, you touched on that, but I want to hear—both from a police perspective and an NHS and social work perspective—about the extent to which issues with staffing resources are impacting on the ability to move the collaboration work forward. What I mean by that is, do we have the necessary number of police officers, social workers and health professionals? Are there any challenges that the committee should be more aware of? Given that we have a session with the cabinet secretary coming up after this evidence session, are there issues around resources in the current climate?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Thanks for that.
Apologies, convener: I had meant to declare an interest before asking my questions. I am a registered social worker with the Scottish Social Services Council, as per my entry in the register of members’ interests.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
That is all right.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
I appreciate that frank and honest reply. That is the same with a lot of situations. There is often low public awareness about politicians and the Parliament. It is good to hear an honest response about that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning to both of our witnesses, and thanks for the evidence so far. I want to ask about the public’s level of awareness of the regulator. The committee heard some evidence that, unless you are a tenant or another service user who is involved with a landlord, there is likely to be a low level of awareness among the public. Do you accept that, or do you have a different view on it?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
You have asked my question to Michael Cameron, which is great.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
I was going to ask about the national panel but you have gone on to answer that, which is great. I was going to ask in particular about the Gypsy Traveller community, but you have given some details. In the interests of time, I will not go back over that, but are there any other groups that the national panel has particularly focused on?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
I welcome the work on the Gypsy Traveller community. I was on the Equalities and Human Rights Committee in the previous parliamentary session, when a lot of work was done on that. Alexander Stewart was on that committee, too.
I have a question on the perception of the panel. We have heard evidence that the panel can often feel one-sided. We were told:
“It is not a two-way process; it is not a dialogue or a conversation. It simply involves answering a survey.”—[Official Report, Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee, 3 December 2024; c 31.]
What would you say to that? Do you take on board that criticism? If so, do you have any plans to address it?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Fulton MacGregor
My question is a wee bit different. I probably did not explain it right. The complainer should have a choice as to whether to give evidence in court or not, but do you ever come across a situation where a complainer would prefer to give prerecorded evidence or evidence on commission—in this example, it would probably be prerecorded evidence—but feel that they are more likely to be believed, for want of a better term, if they do it in court? My question was more about that. If that is an issue—we do not want to go back to the stage 1 evidence, as the convener will probably remind me, so I link the question to today’s discussion—could an amendment be lodged to address that?