Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 6 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3464 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Richard Leonard

In the interests of time, I will go straight to the deputy convener.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Richard Leonard

We indeed have questions on the areas that you have outlined in your introductory remarks, director general, and we will get to those in due course. Before we get to some of those broader points, I invite Stuart McMillan to put a couple of general questions to you, after which I think that he wants to talk with you in some detail about the FMPG situation.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Richard Leonard

You mentioned FMI’s track record and its intellectual property rights. When it was commissioned to do that work, was it required to disclose who else it worked for?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Richard Leonard

No, I am not asking a legal question. I am asking whether FMI is subject to any risk if it is hired to carry out due diligence, for example, and things do not pan out according to its advice. Is there any clawback? What responsibility rests with it?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Richard Leonard

Obviously, as a committee, we can make recommendations in the medium and longer term about changes to the legislative framework that might get us into that terrain. I do not know the status of that work or whether you are able to share that with us. If you are, it would be useful for us to have sight of it, because we are interested in whether you have considered alternative governance arrangements and what they would look like.

We understand that it may be beyond your power to establish such alternative arrangements unilaterally, but we would be interested to know what led you to conclude that that might be a better way of providing oversight.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Richard Leonard

I turn to the question of auditing. David Hamilton, the commissioner who told us that he felt that he was “financially hamstrung”, was the author of the view that the audit process, both internal and external, is disproportionate and overburdensome. You might have seen that evidence from a few weeks ago. As members of the corporate body, have you taken a view of that perspective?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Richard Leonard

A short answer to my next question would be helpful, because I do not want us to go down a rabbit hole.

It is often said that we learn more from failure than we do from success. One of the triggers for the agreement with the Conveners Group was the failure of the Ethical Standards Commissioner, which led to Audit Scotland producing a section 22 report. The Public Audit Committee was of the view that it should not have taken that to resolve some of the issues that had clearly been developing inside that organisation. Have you learned lessons from that about how better to provide oversight, scrutiny and accountability?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Richard Leonard

Earlier in the meeting, you said that the corporate body had oversight over governance and accountability, which is quite a clear responsibility that lies firmly in the corporate body’s corner.

I have one final question in this area, convener, if I may.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Richard Leonard

I have a couple of other questions. As I understand it, there are quarterly meetings between the officer-holder services team and the commissioners and related bodies, and Mr Carlaw said that the corporate body now has biannual meetings with each of those post holders. Previously, I think that it might have been an annual session. For the record, could you confirm that that is how the process works at the moment? Is that the frequency of that interaction?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Richard Leonard

No, that is fine.

10:45