The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3697 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
Your submission—and, I think, the submission from Scottish Chambers of Commerce—talks about matching UK tax rates, cutting property taxes, LBTT incentives and so on. There might be arguments for all those moves, but if the Scottish Government and the Parliament take in less money from those taxes, we might have to, say, cut funding to the NHS or local government. At a time when everyone is struggling and the NHS is clearly under pressure, can you justify cutting any taxes, given such knock-on effects?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
That is helpful.
Your submission says that the
“Scottish Government should undertake and publish a full assessment of Scottish tax powers and their potential to prevent and reduce child poverty.”
Will you expand on what you mean?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
Thank you. Again, I have a question that is primarily for Polly Tolley, unless either of the other two witnesses want to come in. Another of COSLA’s suggestions was that ring fencing should be removed and that we should give local authorities more flexibility in how they spend money. I know that that is an issue for citizens advice bureaux, because some of them get funding from local authorities and some do not. From a citizens advice point of view as well as from a wider point of view, do you have a view on whether we should make more decisions centrally in Parliament or leave more decisions to local government?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
I accept that.
Ms Walker, I did not ask you to respond to any of those questions, but you are more than welcome to. However, my first question for you follows on from what Liz Smith was asking about; indeed, you might already have answered it. You say in your submission that
“Prior to the ... pandemic, the Scottish Government had been considering methods of improving the tax policy-making process and the legislative processes for taxes”
and that you would like to see that worked through. Are you talking purely about a finance bill, or is there a bit more to it than that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
I have another question that is aimed at you, although Mr Robertson might want to come in, too. The voluntary sector has asked for multiyear funding, as it does every year, and a bit more predictability, which Mr Robertson mentioned. In practice—you are looking at the practical side of this—is it possible for any Government, whether a Westminster Government, the Scottish Government or even local government to make such a commitment and to adopt a multiyear approach, rather than the annual process that we have at the moment?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
Adam Stachura’s submission focuses—and rightly so—on pensioners and older people, who might be poorer, but clearly there are also some pensioners and older people who are very wealthy. For example, they might have made a big profit on their houses and have paid no tax on that. If national insurance is increased, that will probably mean that pensioners will not contribute. Is there room to free up resources for people at the poorer end by getting better off or wealthy people to pay a bit more?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
If no one else wants to respond to my question whether there is any scope with regard to tax, I will move on.
In its submission, the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities made the interesting comment that the national care service was “a distraction”. Obviously we are focusing on the financial side today—the care side of things can be discussed elsewhere—but, from that point of view, is the national care service a distraction, or is it something worth investing money in?
I see Adam Stachura nodding. Do you want to say something, Adam?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
Would businesses pay slightly higher fees if they knew that they would get a faster service?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
That is me, unless Mr Robertson wants to come in on any of that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
That was helpful.
You have also mentioned the area of planning and suggested, I think, that council planning departments should get more funding. I wonder whether you can clarify something for me, as I have probably forgotten, and for the general public. Is it not the case that planning is more of a self-funding exercise, given that the fees match the costs?