The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7214 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Edward Mountain
Are you aware of any circumstances in which somebody has not been approved by the committee that has interviewed them? One of the problems is that, because the committees are appointed and run on the d’Hondt system, there is a natural bias towards the Government, as you are aware. In the previous session of Parliament, the examples that I saw and took part in were perfunctory.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Edward Mountain
I think that it has worked—I have unmuted.
Good morning, Ian. I have been hearing you and I hope that you can hear me. I have a series of questions. The first one is a simple yes or no question. Do you think that there is a problem in Scotland with serial board members?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Edward Mountain
Thank you. I think that we may have to agree to differ.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Edward Mountain
I take your explanation, but to me it is a very small pool and the people in the pool keep getting picked. I would not accuse them of wanting to be serial board members but, if someone has been a board member for 31 years, they are obviously doing something. I can give other examples. One person morphed from the Deer Commission for Scotland to Scottish Natural Heritage to Scottish Water. Just as one appointment expired, they seemed to pop up in another one. Expanding the pool might be the answer, and I am sure that the convener will push on that.
I have a further question to do with ministerial appointments during the previous parliamentary session. I sat on various committees that were given the chance to interview people who were being appointed by ministers. I have to say that it was a tick-box exercise. Do you have any evidence of the Parliament ever rejecting somebody, and do you think that the parliamentary committee system of interviewing people who are appointed by ministers is sufficiently robust to ensure that ministers do not shoehorn in the person they want?