The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2811 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Right. So it did not come from the shareholder.
You said earlier—these are your words—that it was a unique situation. There is nothing unique about companies getting into trouble, as you describe it, having to make changes and, potentially, making redundancies. There is absolutely nothing unique in that. The difference with this situation is that any other company would have gone through proper process, so why did you not?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 March 2022
Graham Simpson
I have a final question. Natalie Don asked you whether you would be prepared to accept £5.50 an hour. I do not think that you would be, because I have done a quick calculation based on your basic pay and not bonuses, and you are on a princely £156 an hour. That is pretty good going. How do you think the sacked workers think of you when they look at that rate of pay?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Hello again, Mr Swinney.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Like who? Who would be unwilling? You have relied on guidance.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
I might well do that, in order to help you out. I will leave it there.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Move on, convener.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
I would not expect you to do that. I am trying to get to a point where we move on from our report and your response. The committee said that, when you use the made affirmative procedure, there should be a statement as to why you believe that the matter is urgent. In your response, you say:
“My view is that the Scottish Government already provides a clear explanation of its rationale for urgency”.
However, you go on to say that you are
“happy to work with the Committee to consider how that could be better codified in practice”.
I am keen to find out how we can work together to get to a point at which you provide something that is, in my view, better than what you do at the moment, and we have a proper explanation of why something is urgent.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
In my final question, I will go back to what I asked you about last week—the regulations to close school boarding and student accommodation. Last week, we spoke about your desire for that power to last for an extra six months, even though the Government has never used it. Now you want to have that power permanently. How do you justify having that power permanently when it has never been used or needed?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Having gone through the letter that the committee received from you yesterday, it seems to me that its general tone, and your view, appears to be that the Scottish Government is not doing much wrong in respect of the made affirmative procedure. Considering the committee’s report and the debate that we had in the chamber, I was—I will be honest—disappointed when I read the letter, as you do not seem to accept much of what the committee said. If you think that I have got that wrong, please say so.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Graham Simpson
It can indeed, but it covers such a wide area. The Education, Children and Young People Committee has already taken evidence that included a view that some of the education provisions may be unlawful. If the bill goes through, you run the risk of facing legal challenge. Even if it was just a narrow legal challenge relating to the education part, the whole thing could fall. From my point of view, I do not like the bill, full stop. From your point of view, you want to get it through, but the whole thing could fall because you have decided to lump it together and there might be a legal challenge.