The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 660 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Maurice Golden
Thank you.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Maurice Golden
I think that that would be helpful, convener.
Everyone will agree that there is already a degree of centralisation, given that we are starting with eight specialist units. However, the concern is the rationale behind all this and how we ensure not just the best clinical outcomes but the best patient outcomes.
I am interested in cases in which, as a result of closures, families might have to live apart and in the impact that that might have. Last month, The Courier reported on the case of Lois Cathro, whose triplets were born at 32 weeks, and all under 4 pounds in weight, at Ninewells hospital in Dundee. They received excellent care, but Lois said:
“Had the unit not been there, we could have faced an unimaginable situation.”
Is it conceivable that parents and families might have to make round trips of hundreds of miles between hospitals just to see their babies? What impact might that have not just on their clinical care but on their overall wellbeing and, potentially, on future health and mental health outcomes?
10:00Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Maurice Golden
The report is the first step towards developing a new way to deliver such care, but it is partly predicated on having a support network in place so that its rationale can ultimately be justified. My concern is that the support network might not be in place. After you have reported, who is ultimately accountable for delivering on the report’s recommendations in order to make your rationale successful?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Maurice Golden
I have a question about the cut-off point. Clearly, throughput was one of the criteria used, and I appreciate what you have said about Glasgow and Edinburgh. However, the difference in the scores between the units in Aberdeen and Glasgow is 17 and the difference between the units in Aberdeen and Dundee is 29—following that, there is a bit more of a drop-off.
I wonder about the case for Dundee and Wishaw in terms of the wider package beyond clinical outputs. Clearly, an ambulance can get from Wishaw to the Queen Elizabeth hospital quickly, but if you are a parent from Lanarkshire or the south of Scotland who is trying to visit your very sick child in Govan, you can be stuck for hours on the roads around Glasgow, whether you go via the M74 or M8. How was that taken into account in the overall findings?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Maurice Golden
I will focus my remarks on my amendment 195 only. Amendment 195 is relatively simple and would make it explicit that any review or update to the documents listed in the amendment must have regard to each other.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Maurice Golden
My amendments 174, 176, 179, 180 and 181 are on the measurement of targets. The bill says that the Scottish ministers must specify the manner in which indicators or progress made on the targets are to be measured. That is akin to someone marking their own homework and is not in alignment with other target-setting legislation. For example, section 2B of the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 provides for target-setting criteria for the climate change targets. My package of amendments replicates the target-setting criteria in the 2009 act and applies them to the bill.
My amendment 182 entrusts the evaluation of progress towards meeting the targets to Environmental Standards Scotland and gives ESS the authority to evaluate whether targets have been met. That would require ESS to notify the Scottish ministers and the Scottish Parliament of that evaluation, while retaining the provisions for the Scottish ministers’ accountability to the Scottish Parliament, as well as their ability to self-declare if a target is no longer achievable.
My amendment 188 would require the Scottish ministers to seek and have regard to the views of the relevant committee of the Scottish Parliament with respect to targets or topics.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Maurice Golden
Just so that I am clear, at ground level, what has changed is that the biological sex will now be recorded but, in essence, the treatment of the individuals will be exactly the same. Is that where we are currently?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Maurice Golden
Is that happening as we speak?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Maurice Golden
I fully agree with Mr Ewing, but it is a bit unfortunate that—as far as I can make out—the petitioner’s local authority did not respond. Perhaps the petitioner could take that up with local councillors.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Maurice Golden
I appreciate that there will be an independent review, but three years is an awfully long time. What is the Scottish Government’s current assessment of how effective screening might be in preventing sudden cardiac death? I am thinking about any issues with false positives or negative results as a consequence of screening.