Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 16 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 544 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Maurice Golden

The increased traffic flow into the M77 will be problematic, if you are up in Newton Mearns, and it is already clogged around Silverburn and those areas. There might then be a petition saying that we need to upgrade the M77. I wonder how you model, or look at, the impact beyond the upgrades at hand, if you like.

10:00  

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Maurice Golden

Jackson Carlaw remembers. [Laughter.]

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Maurice Golden

We move slightly closer to home, I suppose. The petition calls on the Scottish Government to protect Loch Lomond’s Atlantic oakwood shoreline by implementing the high road option for the A82 upgrade between Tarbet and Inverarnan, which is one of three options that Transport Scotland considered during early project assessment.

In correspondence to the committee on 19 March this year, the petitioners stated:

“We are demanding Transport for Scotland conducts a full STAG Appraisal of the A82 Tarbet to Inverarnan Project as required by Law.”

Cabinet secretary, what assurance can you offer that Transport Scotland has fully complied with its legal obligations?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Maurice Golden

Thank you, cabinet secretary.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Maurice Golden

On the A77 trunk road between the Whitletts roundabout in Ayr and the Cairnryan ports—approximately 44 miles of single-carriageway road—how do you respond to the concerns highlighted by the petitioners that the current state of the A77 is detrimental to trade with Northern Ireland and has left residents of the south-west feeling “abandoned” by the Scottish Government?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)

New Petitions

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Maurice Golden

I echo Mr Ewing’s comments. As part of the response, it would be useful for the petitioner and, indeed, the Parliament to understand what the Scottish Government’s position is on the codification and enablement of international law in a devolved setting. The Scottish Government has a position on alignment with European Union law, but I am unclear as to how international law in the devolved setting is to be adhered to.

I am not asking for that information treaty by treaty, but I note that, tomorrow, the Parliament has a debate about how the Aarhus convention of 1998 is being enabled in a devolved context. It would be useful to know the Government’s overall approach to the issue. I have concerns that it might not be practical for the Scottish Government to adhere to the timescales requested by the petitioner, but it would be interesting to know what the overall trajectory is.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Maurice Golden

Not now. [Laughter.]

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Maurice Golden

I feel that we have run out of steam, unfortunately, so I recommend closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders on the basis that the Scottish Government does not consider that there is a need to clarify the definition of protected animals in the 2006 act and the associated guidance, and that it considers the sheep on St Kilda to be protected by the Wild Mammals (Protection) Act 1996, in the same way as any unowned and unmanaged population of wild deer are.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Maurice Golden

That is correct. I was looking out for my next pedigree pooch. [Laughter.]

The issue is already covered by existing legislation, but there are precedents for the Parliament going beyond what is already covered by legislation. I think that we should follow up—at least once more, or perhaps finally—by writing to local authorities to seek information on each local authority’s policy on the presence and behaviour of dogs in cemeteries, the number of complaints received in relation to the behaviour of dogs in cemeteries and whether there is any monitoring of cemetery usage. In many parts of Scotland, for lots of people—dog walkers or otherwise—a cemetery is a place where they can access green space. It would be interesting to find out whether local authorities are looking into that, and it would be interesting to know whether any fines have been issued in relation to breaching the current legislation in cemeteries.

10:30  

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 19 March 2025

Maurice Golden

I appreciate that a full answer might be forthcoming but, given that we do not have one to date, we should write to the Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills to highlight the increasing requirement for additional support needs assistance and the pressures that staff face, as set out by the petitioner. We should also highlight the medical duties that are carried out by staff, as set out by the petitioner, and seek a view on whether that level of medical care should be provided without registration or training.

Furthermore, we should highlight the delay to the Scottish Government’s publication of the report on the development of an accredited qualification and registration programme for additional support needs assistance. We should ask why there has been such a significant delay in publishing the report, although I appreciate the comments that you made on that point, convener.

Finally, we should seek information on how the Scottish Government intends to take action to address the issue during this parliamentary session.