The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 660 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Maurice Golden
I want to be clear on the issue of panel assessments of individual cases. In the case of Fornethy—although this could also apply to other cases—a number of individuals are coming forward, and, due to the constraints of the guidance or the act, panel members feel that they cannot provide redress in those cases. However, on the basis of humanity and doing what is right, they think that something should be done.
Is there a process for flagging to the Scottish Government and the Scottish ministers that there is a problem and that Redress Scotland would like to resolve the issue but that you cannot do so? Are conversations taking place on that to ensure that victims get the justice and redress that they deserve?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Maurice Golden
Dignity, respect and compassion appear to be severely lacking in this case. The committee is trying to determine why, who is ultimately responsible and whether we can put right what once went wrong through the redress scheme. I am interested in the system for assessing individual cases. I am a bit confused about some aspects that you have mentioned. For example, you have spoken about exceptional circumstances, about people in the same institution at a similar time acting as corroboration and about ultimately applying the presumption of truth and looking at the balance of probabilities. Does the system allow for such cross corroboration, particularly where no records exist? By contrast, in the standard system, there is an individual case and there are no similar cases. I accept everything that you have said, but it seems as if, in this particular case, either there should be a slightly different system or some of the flexibilities that have been mentioned should be brought in. I am unclear about that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Maurice Golden
Thank you.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Maurice Golden
I am a bit cautious about closing the petition, although I think that we are reaching the end of the road. I wonder whether there might be one final opportunity for the committee to write to the Deputy First Minister and ask for detailed information about the work that is being undertaken to consider the findings and recommendations of the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse for England and Wales, and to ask for an update on the publication of the implementation progress report and its findings. I feel that there was an error in limiting the scope of the inquiry.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Maurice Golden
Thank you.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Maurice Golden
Yes.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Maurice Golden
Thanks; that is very helpful. I am just trying to square the timeline in my mind. On the basis of the evidence that we have heard, around 2014 seems to be the point at which a red flag was raised over the plausibility of completing the project. I think that you pointed to 2014 in terms of the financing aspect and there was probably a significant change in that in 2018. However, the Scottish Government did not find out until 2022 that it would not be possible to complete by 2025. I struggle to find that explanation to be realistic and plausible, given the track record and what had gone before. Perhaps you could comment on that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Maurice Golden
We should close the petition under rule 5.7 of standing orders, on the basis that section 24 of the Children (Scotland) Act 2020 requires the Scottish ministers to arrange a pilot scheme for mandatory alternative dispute resolution meetings and work is under way for the pilot to commence this year. Secondly, the Scottish Government has no plans to review the current system for initiating actions for child contact and residence orders. In closing the petition, it might be helpful for us to flag to the petitioner that they have the option to resubmit the petition in 12 months’ time, should no progress have been made on the pilot.
11:00Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Maurice Golden
That would make sense.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Maurice Golden
What was the impact of Covid on the project?