Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2547 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 16 November 2021

Willie Coffey

If and when the money finally appears, what is your view on that mechanism being applied, rather than the mechanism of the appeals process? We were told in evidence that small and medium-sized enterprises in particular very rarely appeal or are successful in their appeals, because of the difficulty of the process. SMEs can lose out in the appeals process, but it was stated in evidence to us that the mechanism that is proposed can be much fairer and can reach many more local businesses if local government is at the heart of the distribution of the relevant funds. What is your view on that aspect?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 9 November 2021

Willie Coffey

I want to touch base with you on the question that I asked the previous witnesses. In March, the UK Government announced a £1.5 billion business rates relief scheme. Scotland’s share of that is £145 million, but we have not received the money yet. In principle, is that a better way to target support for local businesses compared with the MCC appeals process?

The previous witnesses told us that bigger companies and businesses tend to benefit more from the appeals process. Conversely, we were told that small and medium-sized enterprises tend not to benefit—they either do not appeal at all or they are not successful when they appeal. What are your views on the two approaches that are in front of us to choose from?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 9 November 2021

Willie Coffey

That is very helpful. Thanks very much.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 9 November 2021

Willie Coffey

The wholesale sector has sent a submission to the committee. It was caught between a rock and a hard place during the pandemic in that it was legally able to trade and perfectly able to do so, but it had nobody to trade with. It has made the valid point that, in the absence of any clarity about the relief scheme from the UK and Scottish Governments that I mentioned, it would prefer the appeal process to remain in place. I think that it fears that it might again fall through the net and not receive any support through a relief scheme. Do you have any views on that, particularly in relation to the wholesale sector?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 9 November 2021

Willie Coffey

The last time that we took evidence on this issue, we heard that, unlike bigger businesses, small to medium-sized enterprises tend not to use the appeals process, so there might be an imbalance with regard to the benefits of such a process. A targeted fund might, when it arrives, be a better and perhaps fairer way of distributing support around Scotland’s businesses. Perhaps Martin Clarkson, David Magor or Charles Golding can comment on that.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 9 November 2021

Willie Coffey

Good morning, everyone. We have already mentioned other forms of support and relief. Back in March, the UK Government announced a £1.5 billion fund for further reliefs for business rates, Scotland’s share of that being around £145 million, as was mentioned. We have not seen any of that money yet, but is the more targeted method of distributing that support by our councils a better way to help than to engage in an MCC appeals process?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of NHS National Services Scotland”; and “Personal protective equipment”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Willie Coffey

That is great. Thank you.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Willie Coffey

It is important to probe further what happened. When you were doing the audit, you must surely have asked what on earth the board thought it was doing by proceeding in such a manner, which basically breaks all the guidance for organisations that is known to us and has been known to the committee for many years. What explanation was offered to you for that?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Willie Coffey

If there was so little involvement by most of the principal players who should have been part of the process, who approved the budget? Do you know, Pat?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of the Crofting Commission”

Meeting date: 4 November 2021

Willie Coffey

Thank you, convener, and good morning, Stephen. I want to talk about the commission’s budget. Your report makes clear some concerns relating to development of the budget. It notes that there was a lack of involvement by the board, or by stakeholders more widely, in setting the commission’s budget. It says:

“The draft budget had been developed without prior Board or Audit and Finance Committee involvement. There was also minimal involvement of the Senior Management Team beyond the Chief Executive and Head of Finance.”

Could you tell us a wee bit about what happened? First, who developed the budget? Could you take us through the process of whether it was, in fact, approved? Is that process still in place?