The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2149 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you for that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
Is the balance right though? Why would Co-operatives UK tell us that the flexibility is not there and then you tell us the opposite? Why would it say that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you very much for that.
My other question was on interventions and their costs. We had some evidence about the extremely high cost of some interventions—witnesses told us that the Reidvale intervention cost £0.5 million and the Wishaw one cost £400,000. The discussion that the committee then had was about value for money and justification for such high levels of cost, and about whether those costs are capped and, ultimately, who pays for the intervention that is passed on to tenants. I would like to get your thoughts on the intervention process and whether any careful scrutiny and monitoring need to take place of whether the public is getting value for money from those high costs.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you for that clarification. Is it the regulator’s view that that money was well spent and that the outcomes for tenants were positive enough?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
I invite you to say a few words about compliance, which is another issue that has been brought to the committee In its evidence, Co-operatives UK told us that it thought that the regulator focuses a bit too much on compliance, to the exclusion of, let us say, enabling and facilitating innovation. It pointed to differences between the regulatory framework as it applies to bigger associations and to smaller ones, and asked, I suppose, whether one size fits all. What are your views on that? Is the compliance regulatory framework flexible enough to allow development, growth and innovation to take place?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
It said, for example, that housing co-ops are a different model from other housing management systems, and that smaller associations sometimes feel overburdened by the regulatory framework that impacts on them, whereas larger organisations can cope pretty well.
I suppose that the question for you is whether you apply flexibility in how you deal with smaller housing co-ops, for example, rather than just imposing on them the regulatory framework that must be obeyed. That is really where we are. They felt that there was a lack of flexibility on your part in dealing with them.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
Would you say that cost of the two that I mentioned—nearly £1 million—was money well spent and that the outcomes were positive for tenants?
10:45Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Willie Coffey
It is partly to correct the record on my part. When I was talking about the intervention costs earlier, I should have said that it was the Dalmuir Park Housing Association intervention that, according to Patrick Gilbride, who gave us the evidence, cost £500,000, not Reidvale. What was that money spent on? What benefits were accrued? Ultimately, who decides whether that intervention was value for money?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 December 2024
Willie Coffey
In the interests of balance, the purpose of the meeting is to hear the Government’s view on the late submission of some of the evidence that the committee has received, and to allow it to provide an assurance to the committee about that. I thank the minister for doing that and for attending the meeting.