The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2544 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Willie Coffey
Good afternoon to everyone on the panel. I want to go back to Derek Feeley’s report. One of the key stand-outs for me—I have read it many times—is the point that the driving focus should be
“consistency, quality and equity of care and support experienced by service users”.
That is at the heart of the Feeley review. Is the national care service the instrument to deliver that consistency of service across Scotland? I ask Adam Stachura to pitch in with an answer.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Willie Coffey
I have a question about accountability. Last week, the minister said that, very often, he fields questions in the Parliament but has no accountability for many of the issues that are raised with him. Do you agree that national accountability is needed at ministerial level? I would appreciate a simple yes or no so that other colleagues can ask their questions.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Willie Coffey
During our evidence-taking, the committee also discussed the infrastructure first approach to the planning system across Scotland. What level of buy-in is there from infrastructure providers to support that approach? We heard evidence from witnesses about how important buy-in is to delivering and achieving that. How confident are you that that can be done?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning. I am glad that the witnesses have widened out the discussion. I was hopeful that some of the issues that concern me as a local member and have done for many years would be solved in NPF4, and I would like to get your views on whether they are.
Professor Hague talked about things such as derelict buildings, empty shops and offshore retail owners, and the inability to reach out to those bits of society to get them to play their part. I very much hoped that NPF4 would enable us to deal with some of that. If you look around any city, town or village in Scotland, you will see examples all over the place of urban dereliction and decay, abandoned shops, abandoned land, absentee owners and absentee shareholders, whoever they may be.
I thought to myself, “What is the role for NPF4 in addressing that big issue, because it is what matters to the citizens in my constituency?” Professor Hague talked about perhaps having citizen stakeholders to get a bottom-up approach and solution to the issue. Was it too much to expect NPF4 to address that? What could we do additionally to help NPF4 to deal with that problem in the urban setting?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Willie Coffey
It was on local development plans. Is there a pressing urgency for the planning authorities to revise those plans to get them into fit enough local shape? There are provisions in the new NPF4 that will impact on the local development plans.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Willie Coffey
You both mentioned the local development plans. Is there a pressing urgency for local planning authorities to review their LDPs, particularly when the new NPF4 might include references that are perhaps not contained in their current LDPs? Do the planning authorities need to revise and review those as soon as they can?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you. Robbie, do you have anything to add?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Willie Coffey
That is the very issue that I find difficult. An old building in a town such as Kilmarnock, for example, will have had several purposes over many years. There might be an application to use it for some new purpose or other that elected members or the citizens of the town collectively do not agree with. Planners feel impeded in changing their mind if a particular change of use has already been provided for. How do we inject into NPF4 a sense that people might think differently about what a town should be and what a building should be used for? I do not see that in NFP4 and, having discussed those issues with local planners, I do not think that they feel that they have the ability to do that. Therefore, who should do it? Should it be Professor Hague’s proposed citizen stakeholder group pushing from the bottom up, or should it be some other mechanism? That is what I am trying to get to.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you. I love that phrase “souls on fire”. We need many more of them locally and across Scotland.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Willie Coffey
I will be as quick as I can, convener.
Good morning. The Feeley report has been on the table for nearly two years. Do the witnesses agree with Feeley’s principal recommendation that there should be a national care service?
We will start with Simon Cameron.