The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2547 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Willie Coffey
That was clear enough.
As you will probably have heard, the Law Society of Scotland raised a number of issues of clarity of definitions in the bill. It gave a number of examples in which it feels that there could be scope for misinterpretation. For example, it asked what the phrase “or otherwise undergone development” means, and highlighted other issues with regard to the definition of “risk”—in particular, the phrase “risk to human life”. It gave a host of examples of definitions that might lack a little clarity. Is the Government aware of that, and is it looking to try to define, sharpen up, polish or whatever, the bill’s terminology in order to assist everyone?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Willie Coffey
Good morning, minister and colleagues. I have a couple of questions on the cladding assurance register, and one on issues that have been raised by the Law Society of Scotland.
Is it the Government’s intention that the cladding assurance register will be a one-off snapshot register and that it will not change, or do you plan to regularly update it when changes are made to buildings? If it is the latter, do we need a statutory process to make sure that only responsible persons can update the register? Could you describe the Government’s thinking on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Willie Coffey
The Law Society also helpfully suggested that the Government might consider determining that some buildings fall outwith the scope of the SBA process and carry no risk whatever, because that would aid purchasers, mortgage lenders and so on in the buying and selling of some buildings. The society feels that if that does not happen, processes could be delayed for buildings that are essentially safe.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Willie Coffey
It is good that that is being considered by the Government. We will have to deal with it in some way. Thank you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Willie Coffey
On the issue about potential financial support for GEOAmey, I note that it has just filed its accounts, which were signed off in September 2023. They show that the company reported a profit of £2.6 million, it paid out dividends of more than £4 million and it has cash reserves of £11 million. Why are we talking about financial support going to a company with figures such as that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Willie Coffey
I see in the report that there might have been a request to the NHS to help with scheduling. Has that been rejected? Do we know the reasons why? Is work on-going to resolve that problem?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Willie Coffey
I presume that the SPS is reviewing all this, especially the capacity issue, if the numbers go up in the way that you have described.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Willie Coffey
On the flip side of that, Auditor General, your report has not quite touched on the Government’s efforts to reduce prisoner numbers using effective measures such as bail and remand, sentencing and e-monitoring. Have you had a chance to assess the impact of that yet, or are we still unravelling the backlog? We are still at that peak at the moment, but can we hope to see the measures that the Government has been introducing for a wee while now begin to have an impact, with the numbers becoming more manageable?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Willie Coffey
I want to stick for a wee minute on the question of getting prisoners to appointments on time, whether that is court, hospital, identification parade or whatever. What is the real reason behind that? If a prisoner is due to be at something and there is a time clash, it is impossible to get them there, and more staffing and money will not change that. Has something happened to the timing and scheduling of all those things? Is it a post-Covid increase in activity, or is it to do with catching up on the backlog? Is that a factor in the issue, Auditor General?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Willie Coffey
Other members talked about the potential for the contract to fail overall; the 62 per cent, 65 per cent and 61 per cent performance rates for key activities in the contract might be a factor in that. In case that were to happen, what are the SPS, the Government and everyone else doing by way of contingency to ensure that we can continue the service that we need?