Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 919 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 6 January 2026

Patrick Harvie

A couple of other members have brought up the issue of late sittings. In relation to Michael Marra’s questions, the tail end of a parliamentary session is always fairly busy, although this one seems to be significantly busier than most. Even setting aside the fact that we have a lot of legislation at the tail end of the session, late sittings have been a bigger factor in this session than I can remember them being before.

I assume that, although late sittings will carry some kind of one-off cost when they happen, that has not been a significant figure in relation to the overall budget. At what point would that start to cause worries? In terms of the frequency of late sittings, at what point would the scale of the financial impact become a worry?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 6 January 2026

Patrick Harvie

If we were to speculate that, in the next session, the trend is towards more frequent 10 o’clock sittings and two or three-day stage 3s—something that, previously, did not happen at all—is there a point at which that would create financial consequences that have not been accounted or planned for?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 6 January 2026

Patrick Harvie

My final point is on the accommodation issue that came up earlier. It is more of a suggestion than a request for a response right now. If there is to be further consideration of the Edinburgh accommodation provision, as Andrew Munro mentioned, would it be reasonable to suggest that a principle be included that, if a member whose principal home is in a group 2 constituency can show that renting a room is cheaper than renting hotel rooms, they should be allowed to do it?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 6 January 2026

Patrick Harvie

Yes, they need to comply with the law, but the law allows them to use tax havens. The Scottish Government has, in the past, taken a different approach. For example, it was agreed, following suggestions from my party, that those who are based in tax havens should be restricted from accessing the emergency reliefs that came in during the pandemic. Why is the Government not taking the same approach now?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 6 January 2026

Patrick Harvie

There is a widely recognised United Nations list of tax havens that was used in respect of the tax reliefs that came in during Covid.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 6 January 2026

Patrick Harvie

You are looking for ambition. I am sorry to press this—it is my last opportunity to do so: is it the case that a company that pays below the real living wage will be denied the LBTT relief?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 6 January 2026

Patrick Harvie

Does that mean that they would not be entitled to access the relief?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Transparency of Intergovernmental Activity

Meeting date: 18 December 2025

Patrick Harvie

Good morning. Minister, you have talked about both the improvements that have happened and the inadequacy of where we have got to. What you described is a sub-optimal shambles, to combine your words and those of Keith Brown. I would like us to think for a moment about the extent to which improvement has happened. Am I right in thinking that nothing has in any way locked those improvements in? Even devolution cannot be fundamentally locked in, but it is solid to the extent that an incoming UK Government that wanted to reverse it would find it technically, legally and politically difficult to abolish devolution. It is not impossible, but it would be very difficult. Has anything happened that would make it difficult for an incoming UK Government to go back to the hostility that we saw before?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Transparency of Intergovernmental Activity

Meeting date: 18 December 2025

Patrick Harvie

Does the Scottish Government see any plausible way of locking in the improvement that has happened so that future UK Governments would still be required to work in as collegiate a way as can be achieved?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Transparency of Intergovernmental Activity

Meeting date: 18 December 2025

Patrick Harvie

It would also require a change to UK legislation to make that happen.