The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3461 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Yes. Some of the complexities that the Royal College of Pathologists details seem to be issues that will have been faced and addressed elsewhere.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
My final question sits on the back of evidence that we have received. What evidence do you have that the Civil Aviation Authority would authorise anything that was unsafe?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
It is plain from the subsequent submissions that you have made that concerns were expressed. What was HIAL’s response to and management of those concerns like?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
How should HIAL have approached the development of the project in the first place?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Implicit in that suggestion is that we are at a point when, in other circumstances, we would hear from the petitioner.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I invite our two parliamentary colleagues who have joined us and have been with us at various stages during our consideration of the petition over an extended period to ask you anything.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Does Prospect retain confidence in HIAL and its existing board?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
PE1862, which was lodged by Rona MacKay, Angus Campbell and Naomi Bremner on behalf of Uist economic task force, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to introduce community representation on the boards of public organisations delivering lifeline services to island communities, in keeping with the Islands (Scotland) Act 2018.
When we considered the petition on 2 February, we agreed to write to the Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs and Islands. I am pleased to say that, since that meeting, we have received a response from the Minister for Transport that outlines the process for agreeing who should sit on the selection panel for each public body recruitment exercise. The minister notes that the current process involves a selection panel making recommendations to the minister on all aspects of the recruitment exercise, including what the key criteria for each vacant position should be. The minister therefore indicates that she does not believe that legislative change is required.
Do members have any suggestions? Would we like to hear from the minister and the petitioners to see whether that resolves the issue, or are we satisfied with the minister’s response?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Is that agreed?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
The Alliance will potentially have something to offer for our consideration of the petition. Is that agreed?
Members indicated agreement.