The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4110 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Of course, we are concerned primarily with the petitioner’s concerns, which are very much related to young people and, in particular, to the disturbing culture of youth violence in Scotland. In recent months, the petitioner has received dozens of videos, images and first-hand accounts of the violence perpetrated on young people.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Are we content to operate on that basis? At the same time, as we customarily do, we will alert the petitioner to the fact that, if the review does not advance the issues that they have identified, it is open to them to lodge a fresh petition at a later date. Do members agree to do that?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Would that be to pass on the petition, or is the suggestion that we close the petition but encapsulate the comments of the petitioner, as Fergus Ewing has suggested, in a letter to the minister, and that we write to the Social Security and Social Justice Committee highlighting the concerns that the petitioner has raised?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
PE1931 is about improving the reaching 100 per cent—R100—programme roll-out by prioritising properties that currently have speeds of less than 5 megabits per second. The petition, lodged by Ian Barker, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to prevent digital exclusion for rural properties and their households. We last considered the petition on 8 March, when we agreed to write to the Scottish Government.
For context, Ofcom research found that 10Mbps of download speed was the minimum speed that is needed to meet an average household’s digital needs. That speed was set back in 2018. The Scottish Government response indicates that superfast broadband access has been made available to 62,000 more premises since 2022, and it states that the networks that are being delivered will support download speeds of up to 1,000Mbps. The submission also provides details about the Scotland full fibre charter.
Do members have any comments or suggestions as to how we might proceed?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Maurice, you were told, “There’s a website you can go and look at.” That was the response that you got from the Scottish Government: “Away and find out for yourself, mate.” I think that that was the answer that you were given. Does anything that arises from the response in relation to the ability of local authorities to meet the expectations upon them—which you asked about—lead to further questions that you may wish to put?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Fergus, is there anything that you would like to add?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I am sorry, but that is the name of the petition.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Our job is to advance the petitioner. I am sorry, but I am not here to criticise the petitioner and neither are you.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
The 6VT facility that we saw in Edinburgh was very much evidence of that.
The Milton group flagged up the home and family circumstances of the perpetrators of violence. You have spoken at length about the breakdown in the preventative work and agenda that might have been there 20 years ago and which needs to exist in order to try to stave off youth violence at the earliest point. Where that fails and where there is violence, is there a robust police and prosecution response in place to protect young people when others attack them? When it got from whatever we would prefer to be in place to violence having taken place, the people who we heard from felt let down in terms of the ability of the police to respond, the ability of the security guard to intervene or the prosecution response that took place after that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
To echo what was said, because of that position, the perpetrators of the violence were outside the homes of those against whom they had perpetrated the violence, laughing at them and taunting them further, because there is no police or restorative process. Are those people right to feel let down?