The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 764 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Murdo Fraser
What is that in percentage terms?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Murdo Fraser
I do not know whether Antony Visocchi from NHS Shetland wants to come in, but I want to ask a follow-up question, which I am interested to hear your perspective on, Adelle. You talked about the role of health boards in providing emergency care. Has there been a substantial knock-on impact on the hospital dental service because of the problem of access? Could you talk about your experience, please?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Murdo Fraser
On training, you have said that there is no difficulty with filling places, but do we currently have enough university places for dentists?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Murdo Fraser
Convener, you have been very kind in letting me ask questions, so I will be brief in making final comments. My colleague Jamie Halcro Johnston, who represents the Highlands and Islands, had hoped to be here, but he is in another committee this morning. Clearly, he is interested in this matter, too.
As Kate Forbes said, this affects the Highlands but, elsewhere, it affects my constituents in Perth and Kinross, as part of the Mid Scotland and Fife region, who have very similar concerns not just about the accident rate on the A9 but about the economic impact of the road not being dualled.
It has been very helpful to hear from the petitioners and from Transport Scotland. We wait with interest to hear what will happen on the Tomatin to Moy section. It sounds as though some announcements are imminent on that. We hope so. However, that is only one of the remaining sections of the A9. It sounds as though the preparatory work has been done on all but one section—at Dunkeld—so the only issue that is holding up progress is finance, provided that the contract issues can be dealt with. That is a matter of political will and priorities.
I refer to the petitioner’s comments at the start of the meeting about the number of people who have died. Sadly, as we enter peak tourist season, I dread turning on the news in the morning and hearing about people who have lost their lives on the A9. Some of those are visitors to Scotland who have come on a family holiday but have lost their lives. Sadly, that will continue until the road project is finally completed.
I therefore encourage the committee—if it needs any encouragement—to be like a terrier in pursuing the matter to a conclusion and to continue to press the Scottish Government for the definite timescale that the petitioner is looking for.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Murdo Fraser
Thank you, convener, and thank you for bringing me in. I wonder whether you can shed any light on this rather curious issue that I raised with the earlier witnesses. I am just looking for the exact reference.
A Government-initiated question was lodged on Monday afternoon in the name of Jim Fairlie MSP:
“To ask the Scottish Government when the new procurement for the dualling of the A9 between Tomatin and Moy will commence.”
As I am sure you are aware, the purpose of a Government-initiated question is to allow a statement to be made to Parliament, so such questions are lodged only when the statement is ready. Curiously, in this case—I have never come across this before—the question was not answered and it was withdrawn this morning, which is rather extraordinary. Can you shed any light on that?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Murdo Fraser
Presumably, the process is that you publish a tender document, and then you have to wait for responses for a period.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Murdo Fraser
But, clearly, the clock is ticking when it comes to getting the contract awarded by the end of the year, as was promised to the Parliament.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Murdo Fraser
That helps with understanding the context, although we knew on Monday, when the question was lodged, that we did not have a transport minister. That is a matter for the Scottish Government; perhaps the committee can pursue that separately.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Murdo Fraser
Can I follow up with the other question that I put to Mr Barn? We have gone through two new transport ministers, but when Jenny Gilruth was transport minister, she told Parliament at the beginning of the year that she hoped to make an announcement about the award of a contract for the Tomatin to Moy section by the end of this year. Mr Barn told us that, given the likely timescale, six months to award such a contract would be very tight. Are you in a position to tell us any more about the procurement process for that section?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Murdo Fraser
Right. To go back to the conversation that we have just had with Mr Ewing about the type of contract, are you proceeding on the basis of the existing contract, or are you looking to adjust that for the Tomatin to Moy section?