The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1199 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Michael Matheson
Does anyone else in any other sector have any experience of changes coming about as a result of its introduction?
Nobody? Okay.
My final point is on the issue of who should be liable. We heard evidence in the earlier session that liability should rest largely and solely—it would be fair to say that I am paraphrasing—with the decision makers and the directors in the organisation, and that the workers should be protected from the provisions in the bill. Given that your members are directors, Catherine, what is your take on that suggested change to the bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Michael Matheson
I just want to make sure that I understand this properly. If someone in your organisation carries out an act that results in what, under the bill, is defined as ecocide, who should be liable and face prosecution for committing the offence: the person who initiated it or the directors?
11:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Michael Matheson
I come back to Shivali Fifield. I want to understand fully your explanation regarding the issue of liability.
If an employee, under your definition of “worker”—I am not too sure how you would create that definition—were to act in such a way and commit an act that constitutes ecocide under the bill, and they are found to have done so and the case is proven, who, on the basis of how you are trying to amend the bill, should go to prison for 20 years?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Michael Matheson
I am hearing from some of you a feeling that the bill is not necessary, while some are seeking further guidance or explanation about some of the bill’s provisions. It is worth reflecting on the fact that this is not a regulation-making bill; it is a bill that would create a criminal offence. The guidance and explanatory notes associated with the bill will take you only so far, because the real definition will be set by the courts and some terms will be defined by the courts if the bill is passed.
Is it your contention that the existing regulatory framework for dealing with environmental offences is sufficient? If it is not sufficient, where are the gaps that should be addressed so that the bill would be unnecessary?
I put that question to you first, Jonnie.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Michael Matheson
Catherine McWilliam?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Michael Matheson
Jonnie Hall, do you have a view?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Michael Matheson
Okay.
The bill also makes provision around vicarious liability. I will come to you first on this, Jonnie. We heard evidence from panel 1, earlier this morning, that suggested that the vicarious liability provided for in a piece of wildlife legislation, and the changes that it led to, resulted in a culture change in the sector. Is that your experience?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Michael Matheson
Do the witnesses have any other comments on that? No. That is me, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Michael Matheson
That would be helpful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Michael Matheson
I understand the concept and importing an example to fit that concept, but we do not know whether the definition in the bill would have applied to the circumstances of the example that you have given. Is that correct?