The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3723 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
Today’s statement shows conclusively that Scotland’s emissions are now flatlining. I am really worried that the Government has no big ideas left. No climate change plan has been presented to Parliament, and we do not know when that is coming. What we got today was a revised car use reduction plan that has no action on road user charging, despite congestion in cities such as Edinburgh crippling the economy and the climate. How will the Government use its remaining few months in office to support councils that want to cut congestion and raise revenue to invest in solutions that can benefit ordinary people as they move around?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
Would that cultural development include local food cultures as well? Obviously, one of the concerns around new national parks is what they do for food production and the food economy. Could a park bring out a cultural element and that tradition aspect to food marketing under that aim?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Thank you. That is making me hungry.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
I know that you would not want to comment on the Lomond Banks development itself. However, that particular issue is an example in which a development is in contravention of a park plan but the decision making over it happens elsewhere, and even the process of gathering the evidence and having a discussion and a determination on it is not necessarily guaranteed in the planning system. It feels as if the park authority has planning powers but it is really just the same as any other local authority, and ministers can call things in. There is not necessarily a requirement for a public local inquiry if something is in contravention of a park plan, so I come back to that question about its primacy.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
You would expect the guidance for land management plans to reference park plans when they exist, obviously, and that someone who was producing a land management plan would need to refer to what was in the national park plan in their area.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
There were reports of some intimidatory tactics at the Galloway meetings, particularly from those who were opposed to the park. I do not know what lessons can be learned from that about how the public narrative plays out. Similar concerns were raised during the earlier bid process about aggressive tactics being used around Scotland. What is the Government’s reflection on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
My next question is about where the Government will go next with the policy on national parks. Two other bids—Lochaber and Tay forest—met the appraisal criteria. Perth and Kinross Council led an extensive consultation process for Tay forest, which showed that there was a large majority of support for a national park in the area. You said that the rejection of Galloway as a site for a national park focused on the lack of public support. One area has public support and meets the criteria, so what is the future for a national park in Tay forest? It appears to have everything on the table.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
That would make sense. In Loch Lomond and the Trossachs, I think that just about every community now has a local place plan, apart from three that are aiming to complete them by the summer. That local planning, park planning and land management planning should all flow together and be unified.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
Do you think that there was a heavy reliance on volunteers? I know that some of the volunteers who were working on the earlier bids had to put their heads above the parapet to propose change, at quite a heavy cost to them. It feels as though, for many people, leading a change would put them in a vulnerable space.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
What about the issue of adjusting the boundaries of the existing parks? The Tay forest bid was situated between two existing national parks. Evidence has been brought forward that suggests that the existing national park boundaries do not easily fit with the geography of the area or, indeed, with a lot of the issues around economic development, tourism and regulation of the environment. Would the Government be open to adjusting the boundaries of the existing two national parks, or is that off the table?