The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3659 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
No, I think that we can just move on.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. I will leave my questions there.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
We are considering a carbon budget to replace the previous interim targets for climate change. What is your analysis of Scotland’s contribution? Is it about right? Are there areas in which we could go faster? Is there a moral imperative to go faster, given our contribution to industrial emissions globally? I am interested in your thoughts, as climate scientists, on where you see Scotland sitting, particularly given the carbon budget that is before us this morning. Ellie Murtagh, do you want to come in on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Are other countries around the world, in the early adopter space, seeing advantages of being the first mover, or is everybody sitting back and saying, “We don’t want a competitive disadvantage?”
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you.
09:00Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Would the level of adaptation investment differ substantially between a world at 2° of global warming and a world at 3° of global warming? Is there a point at which the level of adaptation investment infrastructure becomes markedly different, or are we just talking about deeper solutions continuing with the plans that are already in place, but going further?
I am mindful that we have invested in flood management schemes in Scotland that have been based on one-in-200-year events, which are now being downgraded to, in effect, one-in-50-year events. Where should we pitch adaptation in public policy? Is it that 3° world or a 2° world? We heard earlier that 1.5° is gone now. What is the best estimate of where we are going to land?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Gabi, do you want to come in first?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
I will be brief, convener. I am aware that there is quite a lot of uncertainty around peatlands and their impact on climate. Do they store carbon or release it? A bigger issue might be blue carbon in the seas and in wetlands. What is the state of the climate science on blue carbon? Are we turning a blind eye to a far greater source of carbon on which Governments could and perhaps should be intervening?
Who would like to offer a last comment on that? As I understand it, blue carbon is not part of the greenhouse gas inventory. Gabi Hegerl?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Is that not a danger, though, if nobody is looking at it or it is not being adequately considered, because that could throw out our estimates of what is needed? Perhaps it could help us if only we understood it more? I do not know. I think that Fabrice Renaud mentioned blue carbon very briefly in an earlier answer. I will give him the final word.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Cabinet secretary, you mentioned your role in the previous parliamentary session. We served together on the Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform Committee, so you will be aware of how things panned out at the end of that session. That committee and a range of other parliamentary committees came to a view on the climate change plan, and Parliament made more than 80 recommendations to the Government. Although the Government reflected on and made a decision on some of those recommendations, a vast number of them were left to the new Government to make a decision on.
Will things pan out in the same way with the upcoming climate change plan? Will it be the case that, although the Government will be able to reflect on some of the recommendations that this committee and other committees make ahead of the election, you will pass many of them on to the next Government, whoever that might be, so that it can make a decision on the final plan and the content of that?