The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3659 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
I have been reflecting on the conversation this morning, and I will play devil’s advocate. If, under the 2014 act, the courts were able to give, say, an eight-year prison sentence as a result of action by somebody or a company that had led to severe and wanton environmental damage, with clear intent—the action was shown to be clearly wilful—would that, in effect, be ecocide? In our evidence, we have heard that there are lots of ways in which to implement an ecocide law. Monica Lennon has brought forward a clear proposal, but I am thinking about other options, including those under the 2014 act. If a responsible officer was imprisoned for eight years, with there being clear and wilful intent, would that, for all intents and purposes, be an ecocide conviction under the 2014 act?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am not proposing anything at the moment; I am just exploring the territory. If that provision was available under the 2014 act, would the courts, when deciding whether to impose an eight-year sentence, be able to consider whether there had been a severe environmental impact and whether there had been clear intent? I am just exploring, from your perspective, the argument for a stand-alone offence.
10:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
I hope that it will never happen.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
I think that what is being put to us is more about incident reporting. If there was something like a Deepwater Horizon incident—God forbid—in Scotland, it would be about looking back and saying, “How did this occur, given that we have a permitting regime, and what could be learned?” rather than a wider assessment of whether the act is working.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
I think that you are saying that there is no need for amendment of the 2014 act as it stands at the moment.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
As the convener said, we had evidence from the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service that said, in effect, that, if it has to make a decision, it may go down the 2014 act route because the bar is lower and the chances of conviction are, on the face of it, much higher. It is a question of ensuring that options are available at any stage in the process, and that nobody is able to drive a coach and horses through the provisions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
If there had been a severe environmental impact and clear intent, and if the court had to decide whether to impose a five-year penalty or an eight-year penalty, would an eight-year penalty not feel more like the result of an ecocide offence?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay, I understand.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
We have been waiting a long time for that action plan, and I will be delighted to see the outcome of it.
I have a constituent who has been institutionalised in multiple hospitals for the past six years because there is no other option for him. That has resulted in direct harm to him and distress for his mum. We have recently had news that appropriate facilities for him might be opening up in the region, but they are still under development. Until they are opened, he is likely to remain stuck in hospital. Does the minister agree that more must be done now to support people such as my constituent and the many other institutionalised people across Scotland to exercise their basic human rights to independent living and to be included in their local communities?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Mark Ruskell
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the assessment by the Scottish Human Rights Commission that disabled and autistic people are not being supported to exercise their right to independent living, as enshrined in article 19 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, what discussions the social justice secretary has had with ministerial colleagues regarding action that can be taken to address this. (S6O-05216)