The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 609 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
So, this will be at the end of the process rather than at the start.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Some stakeholders have expressed concern about the levels of competence that are required, especially for people who are new to the industry, to be able to stalk at night or shoot deer in woodland. They felt that the competence and training required were not really adequate. They felt that new stalkers with the proposed level of training could be reasonably dangerous in some situations. Has thought been given not so much to those with a huge amount of experience but to those who are coming into the industry, and to providing bespoke training for the more difficult situations such as night stalking and stalking in woodland?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
As part of the panel of advisers, NatureScot would obviously be giving advice, but anybody else on that panel would know that, at the end of the day, it is the regulator. That would create a bit of an imbalance on the panels, because the gamekeeper, who will be making sure that everybody else complies with whatever comes out of that panel’s advice, will also be sitting on the panel. It just seems that that would set an imbalance for people.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
I guess that the conflict lies in the fact that an advisory panel gives advice and it is up to Government whether it takes that advice. If the advice was different from the decision that was made, NatureScot would still have to police compliance with that, even though the panel obviously did not agree with the decision or want it to be implemented.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Yes, but if its advice is different from the action that is taken, how can you then say that it is an impartial enforcer?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Is there a way of using some of those infrastructure improvements for other meat, such as beef, lamb and chicken? Meat travels a huge number of food miles, so could we try to keep all of it within local food chains?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
But it will not come as a surprise.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Five days is not very long. If someone were away, would there be an opportunity to negotiate a change to that notice period?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Are you saying that the bill will not bring something new to the table but will pull together various other bits of legislation in order to set targets?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay. We have had evidence that we already have that flexibility in the existing regulations. Are you saying that there was that flexibility in the regulations but it is no longer available because of EU exit, or are we getting contradictory evidence on that point?