The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1213 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
I can see how tricky that might be. Do you think that there might be other checks and balances in the system now that would prevent an investigation from going down completely the wrong path for so long?
11:00Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
Does a member of the public report that to the PIRC first? Is that how it works?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
How can that still be a misconduct issue? Perhaps you cannot answer that. I am struggling to understand why Police Scotland still pursues the officer for misconduct on something that a court has dealt with. I can understand if there were other separate issues involved, because those would then have to be dealt with. However, if it is a simple case of an assault, surely the matter is dealt with at court—I am talking about cases in which the officer is found not guilty.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
I agree. It seems unfair that an officer could reach their natural retirement date, rather than taking early retirement, and that, a year later, an allegation that they were not aware of could come along. Do you agree that there has to be quite a high test?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
What is the difference, really? What is the PIRC doing? I understand that point, but, when there is an allegation, are you saying that the PIRC will ask to see all the people concerned, take statements from them and draw up a report?
12:15Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
Right. I also want to ask you about the timescales for these circumstances. The PIRC then investigates the criminal case, and that can take up to three months.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
Right.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
Good morning. I want to begin by asking you about the lower standard that you mentioned—I think that this is the first time that I have heard about that. Is that contained in law or guidance? Where does that come from?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
I expect that we will hear from the next panel about what happens after the 90 days. I note that you say in your submission that a distinction should be drawn between
“allegations made while an officer still holds the office of constable”
and
“allegations made subsequent to the officer holding the office of constable”—
in other words, where the allegation comes once they are no longer with the police. Does that mean that you think that there should be some adjustment to the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
It is good to know that you are meeting the 90-day target. Is it fair to say that the PIRC does a lot of the work in preparing reports for the Crown?