Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 7 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1652 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 28 January 2026

Christine Grahame

It is only fair that I do—I have asked for costings.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 28 January 2026

Christine Grahame

Will the member give way?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 28 January 2026

Christine Grahame

I do not demur from anything that I said in the members’ business debate; I meant what I said and I said what I meant. Anyone can have a look at it, since it is a wonderful contribution. However, I do not think that it is appropriate to include the proposal in an amendment to legislation. There are many ways to deal with the issue—I have said that before about other amendments. For example, committees could undertake to ensure that there is an inquiry, and there are parliamentary questions and debates. To me, those are the ways in which members should deal with ensuring that the scheme does what it says on the tin.

There may be innocent reasons as to why something went wrong. I agree that 47 per cent is high—how on earth did that happen? It may be simply be that, in the rush to get ahead of the queue, applicants completed the forms quickly—and incorrectly. Douglas Ross will know that, during the members’ business debate, I queried the guidance that was on the website and which applications had been rejected. In that regard, the minister gave a helpful answer to a written question from Liam McArthur on 4 December that listed some of the reasons. However, no farmer or tenant will be looking at answers to parliamentary questions.

I understand that the minister is busy, but I think that it would be relatively simple for him find a cure for when the fund comes around next time. Douglas Ross would agree that it is a good fund; it almost doubled in size because of demand, which is good. However, if there is concern that the assessments were not handled properly or that there was inequality in the process, let us look into that—that is all. All that I am saying to Douglas Ross is that I do not think that his proposals should be included in primary legislation.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Scottish Hospitals Inquiry

Meeting date: 28 January 2026

Christine Grahame

I am trying to speak with my legal hat on—[Interruption.]

If Anas Sarwar is saying that certain witnesses should have been called and have not been called, that, for me, is a challenge to Lord Brodie. How can it not be?

I have said—[Interruption.]

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Scottish Hospitals Inquiry

Meeting date: 28 January 2026

Christine Grahame

I think that I heard something highly critical of Lord Brodie; I hope that the official report staff picked it up.

Current political commentary on whom to ultimately blame is unavoidable—I accept that—but we should not be rerunning issues.

I want to be strict, I want people to be blamed and I want the matter to be sorted, but that should happen in the inquiry and not in the heat of political debate in the chamber.

The legal framework establishes independence, and the chair is independent, so I find it disgraceful that members—not only Mr Sarwar, but others in the chamber—seem to be undermining the entire independence of the process. That does a total disservice to grieving people.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 28 January 2026

Christine Grahame

I will leave it until I speak to the amendments in the group, if that is convenient, and then I will—

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 28 January 2026

Christine Grahame

I informed the member—[Inaudible.]

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 28 January 2026

Christine Grahame

Will the member take an intervention?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 28 January 2026

Christine Grahame

I apologise.

We all know that Mr Ross is very pernickety, and that is a good thing in a legislator. However, as the member is pernickety, he should have been able to come up with approximate figures. I also add that this will be a recurring cost, and not a one-off fund.

The member is coming to the chamber with this at stage 3. I know that he is a clever man and that he would have anticipated this question, and he has had time since stage 2 to come up with estimates of the cost in the financial memorandum, as he would have been required to do had he brought this as a member’s bill.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 28 January 2026

Christine Grahame

Please do not get overexcited about gulls, Mr Ross—