The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3050 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
So you believe that there are benefits and protections with the current system.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
On public trust, we heard earlier about the evasive techniques that those who respond to FOI requests can deploy. We heard that the bill would prevent that from happening. What are your thoughts on that? There will be organisations that are not as open and timeous as your organisations in responding and which might use such techniques.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
I get a sense that that is the culture.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
I was just about to say that that would feed into the rhetoric that an adversarial approach is taken to requests for information.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
That is a helpful example. Is the public sector ready to implement that proactive duty to publish? What support might it need?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Sue Webber
That is helpful.
Fiona, do you want to respond to those questions?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
That is the very point, Dr Gulhane. When anyone else undergoes a consultation with a medical professional, they are given the full facts. Right now, my other half is having eye surgery, and he was told the full risks and benefits of the operation so that he could weigh up the choices. Such information is given in any interaction with a medical professional, and I expect it to be given in this instance as well. If amendment 158 does not pass today and Mr McArthur seeks to work with me, I will, of course, work with him.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
I will not, Mr FitzPatrick, because I am conscious of the time. I promised the clerks that I would speak for only four to five minutes.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
I am aware of medical professionals who will tell you that the medications that you have listed can induce vomiting and all sorts of concerning side effects. Any medication can do that, depending on the individual. The risk could be one in 10, one in 100, one in 1,000 or one in 100,000, but there are risks for anyone who is taking medicine of any kind. Frankly, Ms Harper, you should be aware of that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sue Webber
Oh, my goodness. The convener used my Sunday name. [Laughter.] I assure the committee that I have just one amendment in the group.
I thank Mr McArthur for referring to my amendment 158 following some of the remarks about how patients must have as much information as possible and how the nature of the options and their implications must be provided to them. My amendment 158 would strengthen the safeguards by ensuring that applicants are fully informed about the potential side effects and risks, including the pain that is associated with the substances that would be used in assisted dying. As we have heard, the period of reflection will begin when the person makes their first declaration, and the assessment that is carried out by the co-ordinating registered medical practitioner is to take place as soon as is reasonably practical after the first declaration is made. At that point, they must inform the person of various matters. My amendment would add specifics to the various matters that are listed in the bill.
I believe that my amendment addresses a serious moral and medical flaw, which is the bill’s presumption that the substances that are used in assisted suicide will always deliver a swift and painless death—that is not the case. Everyone is different, and the way in which they interact with medication will be individual. The bill’s assumption is not supported by evidence. Experience from other countries shows that such substances can have severe side effects. In places where assisted suicide is legal, there have been reports of vomiting, choking and fluid in the lungs—
Would Ms Harper like to intervene?