Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3050 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Sue Webber

Are the duties complementary?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Sue Webber

Fiona Stuart spoke about how some elements of the bill need a bit more scrutiny, particularly in relation to pausing the clock rather than having a mechanism to reset it. There was considerable support in the written evidence for a pause rather than a reset mechanism. The Law Society and the Scottish higher education information practitioners group indicated that they do not support that, however. Why do you not support that move to pause the time for compliance when public authorities are seeking clarification?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Sue Webber

I go back to the whole point of this, which is to be open, transparent and honest with the public. Can you not see how that one provision in the bill would go some way towards restoring trust among the wider public? In not supporting that repeal, your position might be at odds with that of the rest of Scotland. To be blunt, that is where I am.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Sue Webber

That would be helpful. The approach just seems a bit out of kilter with the rest of the evidence that we have taken.

I also have questions on proactive publication. The bill proposes to replace the publication schemes with a statutory duty of proactive publication and a code of practice. What opportunities and challenges do you see in implementing that new duty?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Sue Webber

Is the public sector ready—in terms of resourcing, technical expertise, finance and culture—to implement such a duty?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 November 2025

Sue Webber

I will turn to the proposal to designate a freedom of information officer in every Scottish public authority, which we have heard draws on a model from records management and data protection law. Chris Milne, in one of your responses, you mentioned small start-ups in the university sector. Bearing in mind such examples, how feasible is it for public authorities of different sizes and with different models of freedom of information delivery to designate that role?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Sue Webber

That is the very point, Dr Gulhane. When anyone else undergoes a consultation with a medical professional, they are given the full facts. Right now, my other half is having eye surgery, and he was told the full risks and benefits of the operation so that he could weigh up the choices. Such information is given in any interaction with a medical professional, and I expect it to be given in this instance as well. If amendment 158 does not pass today and Mr McArthur seeks to work with me, I will, of course, work with him.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Sue Webber

I will not, Mr FitzPatrick, because I am conscious of the time. I promised the clerks that I would speak for only four to five minutes.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Sue Webber

I am aware of medical professionals who will tell you that the medications that you have listed can induce vomiting and all sorts of concerning side effects. Any medication can do that, depending on the individual. The risk could be one in 10, one in 100, one in 1,000 or one in 100,000, but there are risks for anyone who is taking medicine of any kind. Frankly, Ms Harper, you should be aware of that.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Sue Webber

Oh, my goodness. The convener used my Sunday name. [Laughter.] I assure the committee that I have just one amendment in the group.

I thank Mr McArthur for referring to my amendment 158 following some of the remarks about how patients must have as much information as possible and how the nature of the options and their implications must be provided to them. My amendment 158 would strengthen the safeguards by ensuring that applicants are fully informed about the potential side effects and risks, including the pain that is associated with the substances that would be used in assisted dying. As we have heard, the period of reflection will begin when the person makes their first declaration, and the assessment that is carried out by the co-ordinating registered medical practitioner is to take place as soon as is reasonably practical after the first declaration is made. At that point, they must inform the person of various matters. My amendment would add specifics to the various matters that are listed in the bill.

I believe that my amendment addresses a serious moral and medical flaw, which is the bill’s presumption that the substances that are used in assisted suicide will always deliver a swift and painless death—that is not the case. Everyone is different, and the way in which they interact with medication will be individual. The bill’s assumption is not supported by evidence. Experience from other countries shows that such substances can have severe side effects. In places where assisted suicide is legal, there have been reports of vomiting, choking and fluid in the lungs—

Would Ms Harper like to intervene?