The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2354 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
I have three amendments in the group: amendments 148, 149 and 155. They concern the geographical challenges of our rural communities, which the committee heard strong evidence about during stage 1.
The purpose of the amendments is to specifically highlight that consideration needs to be given to rural and deprived communities, so that full access is available. To pick up on Willie Rennie’s earlier comments, if everyone was independently wealthy, we would not have this challenge, but that is not the case, and the reality is that those in our rural and deprived communities face some of the greatest struggles. The amendments would place in the bill an acknowledgment both that that fact has been noted, as was done by the committee at stage 1, and that it must also become a specific consideration in the provision of services.
Amendment 155 would define deprived areas by making reference to the Scottish index of multiple deprivation.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
I am grateful to the minister for articulating what already exists in the bill and the proposals, and the absolute obligation that rests on Scottish ministers to ensure the availability of advocacy and other services across Scotland. I welcome that undertaking.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
We are talking about young people and so we have to go back to the basis of getting it right for every child. The individual support and assessment that one individual child may need is very different from what others may need. The phraseology in Sue Webber’s amendment allows a very wide scope of input and support to prevent, as it seeks to, the removal of the child from the family.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
Do you want to explain, Mr Simpson?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
The regional recall poll will have—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
That is all right. Mr Simpson, are you happy to take a subsequent intervention from Sue Webber?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
Group 2 is on the criminal offence ground for recall. Amendment 110, in the name of Sue Webber, is grouped with amendments 111, 93 to 96, and 112 to 123. If amendment 117 is agreed to, I cannot call amendment 33, which has already been debated in the group on recall process for regional members.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
It is up to members whether to take an intervention, but I am grateful to you for doing so. Are you not concerned that, if your amendments are passed, it would open the bill to a human rights claim, whereby natural justice would patently not be followed?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 3, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 110 disagreed to.
Amendment 111 moved—[Sue Webber].
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Martin Whitfield
The question is, that amendment 111 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.