The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1653 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
For clarification, you are all content that, once it has been identified that 10 per cent has been reached, the petition should just be closed. I am dreading the next question, because I know what it will open up.
Should where you sign the petition be geographically limited? If we were to think in regional area terms, why could I not travel to Dumfries and sign the petition there, other than because of the fact that the office there would have no record of my registration?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Yes. It might be a policy decision—I am happy for you to say so if it is—but would that be reasonable? Would it be practical? In order for the administration to be straightforward, should the signing of the petition be restricted to the geographical area where you are registered?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
It is more a high-level electoral voting facilitation question, rather than one in respect of the bill that is before us.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, the answer in relation to the bill is that there is a geographical restriction because that is the register that people are on for the petition. That is helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
As you discussed, is there a danger in relation to the availability of places in which to sign, from an accessibility and support point of view? We protect our polling stations for good reason, because we know where they are and what they are. With the signing petition, an address could suddenly become unavailable and 11,000 people could turn up on Monday morning at 9 am, because that is when the place opens. Is that an issue from an administrative or practical perspective?
I am happy for you to consider that and come back with an answer. Is there a balance in relation to doing what Graham Simpson proposes and absolutely restricting the areas where petitions can be signed by telling people that that is the only place that they can sign it?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is fine.
I ask the question because of comments that I have noted both in your submission and in others about the use of postal votes. The simple challenge is that someone might return their postal vote when the petition has already been closed; however, we know what the postal vote will say, because of the question that has been asked. Is there an issue that we should be considering with regard to postal votes and closing the petition early, or could we say that the petition should stay open for the four weeks, because, at the end of it, people would know the proportion of the electorate who voted for the recall, compared with the whole? Is there value in having that information?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
In that case, would it better if some of the requirements sat in secondary legislation rather than primary legislation, so that, as more information became available and as we understood things better, it could be amended more easily?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
The reality is that, with the deep hope that the situation will happen infrequently, the exercise has to start every time that the situation occurs.
I want to go back to the challenges with regard to registration. A lot of the evidence that has been submitted relates to the challenges that occur if another local by-election is being held at the council level. Do we need to bring together the systems in respect of whether a person is or is not on that register, to take account of that challenge? I accept that that situation is administratively challenging, but is it one that, if the right level of clarification were to be given about the cut-off dates, could be made to work administratively?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
I think that I am pushing at the point that the petition is not an electoral event but that, for the purposes of the behaviour of those who—