The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2354 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Let us say that we entered a 16-week period of suspension quite close to the election day. That would have an impact on postal votes and on registration, so there could be—to use your description—churn. I agree that postponement—and related decisions—is a policy decision but, from an administrative point of view, what are the challenges were the register to reopen during that period, with more people becoming eligible to vote, and what are the challenges were it to remain closed, with the electorate being fixed in line with the original timetable?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Please do. That is a genuine offer, because although, on the face of it, that would appear to be a useful provision to have, the unknown unknowns become very important here. You are right to say that, whichever way the decision went, it would be workable, but I think that there should be an input on the practicalities, depending on when the decision is made. That is very helpful.
I want to push on the cost element of a postponement, from the point of view not just of registration but of implementation. How big an effect will a postponement have on cost for those who administer the process?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
There is always another one. Thank you for that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Would it help if there was an explanation of the sort of grounds that would lead to a postponement? Would it be helpful from your point of view if there was a clarification of the test that the Presiding Officer had to apply?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
I will pose a problem with the pilots. If the board is added as an initiator, it might be challenging for regions to say no to the board.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
It is always on election day that it happens.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful.
It seems that the committee has finished its questioning. I remind our witnesses that, once they have had an opportunity to consider their evidence, the offer is there if they would like to write to us, particularly on the one matter that we have raised, in which case we look forward to receiving that further information.
I thank our witnesses for their attendance and their contributions, both beforehand, in the call for evidence, and during this meeting.
10:34 Meeting continued in private until 11:04.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. I absolutely respect that there is a policy element in contrast to the implementation aspect.
You said that one possible amendment would involve individuals having limited leave to remain for the full period of the proposed office. Are you able to comment on whether that is a practical solution, given that those who are granted limited leave to remain are given varied periods of time and that there is certainly no consideration of electoral office cycles in that discussion?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
No, I appreciate that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
I have no problem with that.
The proposal received significant support in the committee’s consultation on the bill and, prior to that, in the Government’s consultation on electoral reform. Malcolm Burr, leaving aside any problem with the policy decision, you see there being two practical problems with the proposal. Probably the most concerning would be a rise in the number of by-elections, which cost money and are problematic within the structure. The other problem relates to being able to identify, at the time of an election, whether there is likely to be a problem coming down the line with limited leave either expiring or being rescinded. Your comments are very helpful.
I will now hand you over—throw you on the mercy of—the committee. I go to Stephen Kerr first, and then to Ivan McKee, who will carry on with the next block of questions.