The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1158 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Sharon Dowey
Okay. Thank you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Sharon Dowey
In your opening statement, you said that you accepted all the recommendations in the Audit Scotland report. Can I double check that that is the case? Are there any recommendations in that report that you have any reservations about?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Sharon Dowey
Paragraph 105 on page 45 of the report states:
“in March 2021 the Scottish Government finalised the arrangements to fund and manage the vessels ... This included replacing the existing fixed-price contract between CMAL and FMPG with a new contract (for each vessel) between itself and FMPG. The Scottish Government is committed to paying the additional vessel costs, regardless of the final price.”
You have just said that you are looking for something at as low a cost as possible. Is it normal for the Scottish Government to hand a contractor a blank cheque?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
I have a wee question about the Erik Østergaard email that was sent on 26 September. He made it quite clear that the contract should not have gone ahead. In the evidence that you have given today, you have referred to CMAL as the expert in shipbuilding. Why would its recommendations have been ignored?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
So, even though all the issues were handed to the ministers, they did not have an in-person meeting to discuss it with the shipbuilding experts.
On 8 October 2015, an email was sent to Derek Mackay and Keith Brown. The sender’s name is redacted, as is a list of other people who were copied into the correspondence. It states that the
“DFM approved the financial implications of the contract award prior to the announcement by FM on 31 August that FMEL were ‘preferred bidder’.”
It goes on to say:
“it is clear that the Board of CMAL are still concerned”.
At the end, it asks for the minister’s confirmation that he is aware of the issues and is
“content to give approval ... to proceed.”
It also asks whether:
“the Minister wanted to speak to a representative of the CMAL Board”.
Is it fair to say that it was the Deputy First Minister who was made fully aware of the financial implications prior to the announcement by the First Minister and that it was him who authorised the contract to go ahead?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
It looks as though the ministers were not happy with the financial implications, so they handed it over to the Deputy First Minister to give authorisation.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
He moved on to another Government position.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
Right.
In an evidence session that we had with the Auditor General for Scotland, he confirmed that
“In the absence of formal written authority under the terms of the Scottish public finance manual in Scotland ... If an accountable officer does not request such written authority, the accountability for the decision rests with the accountable officer.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 28 April 2022; c 28-29.]
Why would the accountable officer not have obtained that, and why would it not have been stored safely? My question is due to the number of issues that have been raised throughout.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
How long was Mr Middleton in that role?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Sharon Dowey
He was experienced in his role, then.