The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1229 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Katy Clark
I will pick up on what has been said. In the previous evidence session, which the witnesses might have heard, the view was that 50 per cent of the council seats should be held by trade union representatives. The bill suggests a composition of 12 members. Could you say more about whether you think the proportions of the new council’s membership are important? What should those proportions be? We have already heard about trade union representation, but what should the employer and academic representation be?
Given that I am not in the room, it might be better if the deputy convener could bring in a witness who looks like they would like to respond.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Katy Clark
I cannot see who would like to come in. Would Ian Tasker like to come in?
10:15Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Katy Clark
Okay, so that would inform decisions that were taken thereafter.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Katy Clark
No. We can think about that issue later. That is helpful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Katy Clark
No. The composition of the council is a wide issue, but I fully understand the points that Linda is making.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Katy Clark
My question is for Linda Somerville and is about the composition of the council. The STUC submission suggests that 50 per cent of the body should be trade union representatives. I appreciate that different unions operate in different sectors and will have knowledge of different occupations, but I ask Linda to explain why 50 per cent is the right level and say a bit more about what the overall composition of the body should be. We understand that the United Kingdom body is dominated by people from scientific and academic backgrounds.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Katy Clark
My question picks up on some of the evidence that we have already heard. We know that the United Kingdom body is already considering many of the issues discussed. Covid has been mentioned by Norman Provan more than once, and long Covid has been discussed, too. There are obviously significant issues around cancer and other conditions that relate to firefighters, and the issue of women’s occupational health has been strongly emphasised in this evidence session.
It is a concern that, if the proposed council is a scientific body—a committee or body made up of academics—it would simply be duplicating work that is currently carried out by IIAC, without producing different outcomes. We are trying to understand what the added value of the new body might be if it is considering the same issues. Noting what you have said already, do you believe that there would be different outcomes if the composition of the body was different? Are you suggesting that the evidence that would be considered would not be purely scientific, and that there would be other evidence?
I invite Linda Somerville to respond first, as she is representing the STUC.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Katy Clark
No.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Katy Clark
I am asking how we can avoid duplication with the work that is going on at a UK level and how we ensure that there is added value. You have covered a lot of that already, but the committee is concerned, in particular, about how we avoid duplication.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2023
Katy Clark
I will ask about how we apply knowledge and the test that SEIAC would apply. There has been mention of reasonable certainty and the double-risk test. How should the test that the council would apply be developed? Would the council itself do that? Does the Parliament need to set it in legislation? Considering other European models, how do you suggest that Scotland approaches developing that test? You might recommend a test or the process by which one might be developed.