Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 1 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2343 contributions

|

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 21 September 2021

Pam Duncan-Glancy

Thank you very much for that. It was really helpful—particularly your analysis of the human rights that are at play here. It is really important that we have a solid understanding of those if we are going to take a human rights-based approach to the work, which I hope and believe we will.

I have a question that sort of follows on from some of the conversation. Forgive me if it sounds as though we are labouring the point, but it is important that we get this right, for all the reasons that we have rehearsed.

In the SHRC submission, you say that the legislation should be drawn up to ensure that there is no interference with religious thought or access to non-judgmental support such as has just been described. Can you tell us a bit more specifically about how that would be drafted? For example, would it be a lift and lay from the Victoria legislation, or would it be something different? Is there something missing from that legislation or something that should be amended?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 21 September 2021

Pam Duncan-Glancy

The equalities commission in Victoria has a specific role in the Victoria legislation to mediate, intervene and investigate. Could that work in Scotland? If so, who could play that role?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 21 September 2021

Pam Duncan-Glancy

Thank you. I apologise for skipping ahead to the international stuff. I realised that I stopped the conversation on Pam Gosal’s question—I apologise for that.

My question has almost been answered by what has been said. In its submission, the Equality and Human Rights Commission talks about a

“harms-based approach, which disregards benign intent”.

Given what we have heard about the rapporteur’s definition of harm and the three prongs, we could make an assumption, but how would you define “benign intent”?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 21 September 2021

Pam Duncan-Glancy

I thank the witnesses for the information that they have provided, which has been really helpful. Both of the sessions this morning have been excellent.

My questions are on the same issue that we have been discussing. We heard earlier that affirmative practice is about non-judgmental practice, very much in the circumstances that you have just described around therapy settings. Are the current training and support for therapists adequate to ensure that people can provide that non-judgmental approach? If the training is adequate, that is great. If not, what intervention is needed to help us to move in that direction, given the importance that you have ascribed to the memorandum of understanding and training practices?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 21 September 2021

Pam Duncan-Glancy

That was really helpful—thank you.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 21 September 2021

Pam Duncan-Glancy

You have talked about the need for investigative powers. We have heard in various submissions about the approach in Australia. In particular, Victoria has legislation on the issue and has given the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission powers to investigate, monitor, intervene and so on. Could that approach work in Scotland? Is there a body with which we could lay such powers? Where should the powers lie?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 21 September 2021

Pam Duncan-Glancy

Thank you. That is helpful. Convener, would you mind if I just followed on with the international question? I know that it is a bit further down the list, but it relates to the point about Victoria.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2022-23

Meeting date: 16 September 2021

Pam Duncan-Glancy

Thank you for coming along. What is the panel’s assessment of trends in child poverty in Scotland, the likelihood that we will meet the targets, and whether you think there is any way other than by using social security to meet the targets?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2022-23

Meeting date: 16 September 2021

Pam Duncan-Glancy

Thank you for allowing me to come back in, convener.

The answers were really helpful. I have two brief follow-up questions. First, would doubling the child payment as soon as possible—as in, now—and again next year have an impact on meeting the targets? Secondly, on the point about social housing, are we currently targeting such housing at the right families in Scotland?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Social Security (Up-rating of Benefits) Bill

Meeting date: 16 September 2021

Pam Duncan-Glancy

Thank you, minister, for drawing the matter to our attention. I see no reason why we should not support the LCM. In fact, I think that if we do not, we will deny payments to some individuals. I agree that a legislative consent motion is the right thing at this time.

We are constantly hearing about additional changes to benefits; this morning we heard from a number of poverty organisations strong evidence that we need to be doing things around eligibility for disability benefits and carers benefits sooner rather than later. We hear consistently that the system is almost at capacity in terms of safe and secure delivery of the benefits that we are already delivering. Is now the time to look at capacity in the system, and to consider what additional resources might be needed?