The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1316 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Does Mr Hazelwood’s point about section 23, which gives power to the Scottish ministers to define guidance or even provide specific regulation on what the qualifying criteria might be, give you some comfort that it could be an evolving situation, and that a better definition could come through secondary legislation?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Might that introduce an inherent bias towards providing assisted dying, as opposed to other options such as palliative care?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Thank you. Do any other witnesses have views on that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Thank you very much. Are there any final remarks from witnesses, before I conclude?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I thank the witnesses for their answers so far and will pick up on some points that were raised during last week’s meeting regarding the seniority and specialty of doctors. Are you concerned that the bill is not sufficiently specific about the grade of doctors who would undertake the assessments? Should the bill be amended to define that more clearly?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I also want to ask about the risk of doctor shopping, which is the colloquial expression. There is a concern that, if someone seeks an assisted death and there is a dispute with clinicians, there may be sufficient scope in the bill for people to seek referrals to a point at which they can get what they want, regardless of the concerns that have been raised by clinicians. There does not seem to be provision for any clinician to raise concerns about safeguarding, for example, in respect of that. Do you share that concern, or do you have a view on whether there should be tighter regulations on the nature of referrals and on who does the referring? If there is a need for a second opinion, should the initial clinician, if they are minded to grant the request for assisted dying, be able to refer onwards to someone who might be in agreement, or should it be more neutral, or more regulated?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Is that the idea of having an ethics panel, or some sort of central register, as defined in the bill? Would that be a more satisfactory structure for you?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful. Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Do Mr Okasha and Ms Dalrymple have any views on the definition of “terminal”?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
What amendments to the definition might satisfy you?