The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1240 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
I thank the panel members for coming today. I want to touch on a topic that was discussed in our earlier evidence session. We discussed the tension between a level playing field, so that consumers have confidence that the services are of a certain standard, and managing the barriers to entry for smaller, independent, home-based businesses. What is your view on that balance, and how could regulation be implemented without disproportionately affecting smaller players in the market?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
If there is a difference between Scotland and England, do you think that our legislation could have potential unintended consequences, particularly around driving behaviour underground, into an unregulated space, or to different jurisdictions or even overseas?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
Ms Brownlie, you mentioned that certain treatments are not appropriate in certain settings. Could you give us a couple of examples of what you are talking about, for clarity?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
Thank you. Are there any other views?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
There are points about the proportionality of the regulations, the idea of the level playing field and the need to have a pathway for reaching compliance.
What support would be helpful in enabling people to reach compliance? It was mentioned earlier that prescribing was a practical challenge, but practitioners work in collaboration with prescribers, so maybe that is one example of where things could be more tailored or more nuanced.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
Is your key issue the need to have a level playing field?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful. Could mitigations be designed, such as support for training, so that individuals could develop their skills to meet the regulatory requirements that are to be introduced? There is also the issue around facilities and logistics, which we have discussed. Could there be access to common clinical space and a common user facility? How might that be developed? What is your view on how that could happen? It might be a nice idea, but would you create—
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
You mentioned in your initial response to my question that it is not appropriate to carry out certain treatments in, say, a home setting. Could you give me some examples of what you are talking about?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
Thank you. I think that Tina McCaffery also wanted to comment.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
Okay. On the point about prescribing, what would an ideal structure look like for you?