The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1689 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2026
Collette Stevenson
I think that John Halliday wants to come in, and then I will bring in Jim Brodie.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2026
Collette Stevenson
Thank you—that is a good point.
I see that John Halliday wants to come back in.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2026
Collette Stevenson
Thank you very much, John. I am just conscious of the time, so I will try to wrap things up.
I thank everyone for their evidence today—I could sit here listening to you for longer, and could ask you lots of questions. However, from what we have heard, I think that what lies at the heart of this is people and ensuring that they can have a dignified celebration of their life.
We will now have a chat about what we have discussed, but if you have any other points that you did not have a chance to put forward, you are welcome to follow them up in writing.
I know you are all very busy, so I conclude the committee’s public business and move the meeting into private session.
10:47
Meeting continued in private until 11:22.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2026
Collette Stevenson
Thank you, cabinet secretary. We will now move to questions. Our questions on both instruments will be directed to you, but I reiterate that you are welcome to invite any officials to respond, should you wish to do so. I invite Jeremy Balfour to ask the first question.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2026
Collette Stevenson
I thank the cabinet secretary and her officials for providing evidence today.
I suspend the meeting to allow for a change of witnesses.
09:11
Meeting suspended.
09:12
On resuming—
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2026
Collette Stevenson
Based on what I have heard, I will try to turn the question around. Given that the majority of awards of funeral support payment already go directly to funeral directors, would removing the claimant choice entirely be proportionate to the scale of the issue that you are describing?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2026
Collette Stevenson
The next item of business is a round-table discussion on the funeral support payment. I welcome our witnesses to the meeting. With us, we have: Adam Stachura, director of policy, communications and external affairs, Age Scotland; John Halliday, chair, Caledonia Funeral Aid; Jim Brodie, managing director, Brodies Funeral Services, who is also attending on behalf of the National Association of Funeral Directors; Gerry Boyle, regional manager, Dignity Funeral Directors; and Andrew Purves, chief operating officer and director, William Purves Funeral Directors.
The meeting is in a round-table format, which we hope will enable a free-flowing conversation. The committee is very much in listening mode today—because I told members earlier that that is what will happen—so, if you wish to speak, please do so.
We intend to address four main themes, and we have about an hour and 15 minutes, give or take, in which to do so. I encourage members and witnesses to be as succinct as possible in their questions and answers.
I will introduce the first theme, which concerns the issue of whether the funeral support payment is made to the client or the funeral director. I want to specifically address the effects of giving clients a choice about whether the funeral support payment is made directly to them or to the funeral director. From the information that we have received, we know that around 60 per cent of payments are already issued directly to funeral directors. However, we have also heard concerns from some stakeholders about non-payment and potential financial risk. I am keen to explore the scale of the risk and the extent of the issue, whether the evidence supports any structural change and whether there are any proportionate alternatives that protect bereaved families and funeral providers. My first question is, are we talking about a small minority of cases, or is the issue more widespread? Jim Brodie, would you like to come in on that?
09:15
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2026
Collette Stevenson
That is okay.
Before we move on, I remind Jeremy Balfour that it he wants to come in he should first declare his interests.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2026
Collette Stevenson
Thank you for that information. Gerry, do you want to come back in?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2026
Collette Stevenson
That brings us to our final theme. I invite Alexander Stewart to facilitate that.