The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2839 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
That is grand. Thank you very much.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
So, Mr Eustice will be appearing in front of this committee on 18 May.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
On a point of order, deputy convener. In the exchange between the convener and me on 12 January, the convener said:
“We wrote to George Eustice and got a response. Unfortunately, he was unable to attend on the date that we asked, but I am confident that we will have him in front of us at some time in the near future.”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee, 12 January 2022; c 31.]
Can you or the clerks advise whether the committee was subsequently able to reach Mr Eustice to ask him to give evidence? Is there any explanation of why the committee has been unable to hear from Mr Eustice, and is there any update on when we can expect to do so?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
An awful lot of discretion is given to local authorities in the bill. Is there a concern that they have too much discretion and that people who make applications for licences will not have a say in how the meeting will be held? Perhaps Mairi Millar would be the best person to answer that.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
I will go back to some points that John Mason raised and will direct my question to Fiona Blair. It concerns the guarantee of in-person registration. The Scottish Government’s position is that the effect of sections 18 and 20 is that a local registration office must offer in-person registration to any individual who desires it. Is that your reading of the bill?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
As more people take up the digital option, will there be problems further down the line with smaller and smaller numbers of people who want to have an in-person meeting being able to be accommodated?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
There is nothing in the bill that says that the local authority must provide the in-person option. Do you think that that should be added to the bill?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
I will press you a wee bit on that. You say that the local authority should still have discretion. That is regardless of whether someone lives in a remote area—I live in a remote area myself. I may be dissatisfied, for instance, with the decision that a local authority has taken on how a meeting or application is going to be conducted, as there is nothing more frustrating than not being able to speak to someone face to face. If the local authority has the final say on that discretion, where does that leave the person who feels dissatisfied with the fact that they cannot have a sit-down, face-to-face conversation? Surely there should be some provision in the bill that allows people to say, “Sorry, but I’m not happy with that. I want to sit down with somebody.” Is that not something that you would consider?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
It is easier for the registration of births, deaths and marriages to be able to hold appointments, as those departments will always have the requirement for an office, but that is not the case for local authorities when people are trying to deal with licensing.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
I direct this question to Professor Harrison. On international obligations and the JFS, you said in your submission to the committee:
“if no international obligation exists, it would appear that the Secretary of State cannot act unilaterally and the consent of the devolved administrations may be needed for the determining a fishing opportunity insofar as the determination falls within the competence of a devolved administration.”
Do you have concerns about that? Can you expand on what your concerns are?