The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2089 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jim Fairlie
But if you were subject to a vexatious allegation, and Billy Telford and his crew arrived and ascertained very quickly that you had not done anything illegal, what would be the problem?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jim Fairlie
I fully accept that, but we need to be clear that the bill team stated last week that the bill is not about curtailing people’s ability to hunt—people should still be allowed to hunt.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jim Fairlie
I would rather hear what other folk have to say, convener.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jim Fairlie
I would have thought that laws were always made on the basis of those who would abuse them rather than those who would keep them.
I also ask the same question of the SGA and Jake Swindells. Would you be able to have a rough shoot with a two-dog limit?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jim Fairlie
Under its definition of rough shooting, the BASC says:
“Virtually all the quarry species listed can be walked-up (i.e. where the shooters flush out the quarry as they walk through the cover)”.
As Police Scotland will be responsible for enforcing the legislation, would you have a concern about your ability to interpret the following scenario? Five guys are out on a shoot, and each has a dog or a couple of dogs. They are well spaced out as they walk; in fact, they have enough space between them not to form a pack but it still allows them to enjoy the rough shoot. If somebody came to you and said, “These people were walking through a wood; they had a certain number of dogs; and a rabbit or a hare was shot,” would Police Scotland be able to interpret that scenario?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jim Fairlie
Briefly—Jake Swindells has just touched on this—from the police’s point of view, if you arrived on a shoot and there were eight dogs, but they were all Labradors and spaniels, would you be able to make a judgment?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jim Fairlie
Would you base your consideration on what you found when you were asked to go out to an event?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jim Fairlie
To complicate that even more, if six people were out shooting who were 50m or 60m apart and they had two dogs each, would you have the capacity to differentiate them? If so, how would you do that?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jim Fairlie
I understand that you feel that you might be open to vexatious allegations, but could your shoot still function with two dogs?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jim Fairlie
So, you would need more than two dogs—