The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2160 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jim Fairlie
Would that also not require NatureScot to be able to go out and measure the depth of peat?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jim Fairlie
I am possibly misunderstanding.
09:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jim Fairlie
Given that the licensing scheme has the potential for an investigation and suspension of the licence, does the fine element of it make it a lot harder to retrieve any money? Would there be more cost in trying to get the burden of proof to a level where a fine could be imposed?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jim Fairlie
You talk about reporting “without good reason”, but the reason would be—I have had this conversation with various welfare organisations—to understand how many animals are killed annually, in particular to increase grouse numbers. That is the challenge that would come back to you. How do you answer that? That is not a trick question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jim Fairlie
I am keen to explore a wee bit further the range of relevant offences. The bill identifies relevant offences under part I of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, the Protection of Badgers Act 1992, part III of the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c) Regulations 1994, section 1 of the Wild Mammals (Protection) Act 1996 and the Hunting with Dogs (Scotland) Act 2023. Given that your review looked specifically at raptor persecution, do you believe that the inclusion of all those things in the bill is proportionate?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jim Fairlie
I would like to ask question 8.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jim Fairlie
I want to touch on the understanding of the extent of use of different wildlife traps in Scotland and what the overall impact is on animal welfare and biodiversity. What is your view on the suggestion that licensing should be supported by statutory reporting in order to increase transparency and enable a better understanding of the impacts? I will direct that first to Alex Hogg.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jim Fairlie
It is about the numbers and the extent of use of different wildlife traps in Scotland and their overall impact on biodiversity. What is your view on the suggestion that licensing should be supported by statutory reporting? In other words, if you set 100 traps, you have to say where those 100 traps are, what you have caught in them and how many animals are killed each year.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jim Fairlie
Correct me if I am wrong—I may be misinterpreting or misunderstanding you—but, if you were going to fine somebody because they had done something on the grouse moor or on the land that would be subject to a fine, you would need a burden of proof to do that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jim Fairlie
Could you explain what you mean by “poorly despatched”?