The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1640 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Natalie Don-Innes
There are quite a lot of points in there, so remind me if I do not manage to cover everything.
As I have already set out to Mr Rennie, we have protected £1 billion in the budget to ensure that we can continue that 1,140 ELC offer, and Mr McLennan is right that that saves families more than £6,000 a year.
I have already spoken about the additionalities of the breakfast clubs and wraparound school care, but we continue to expand childcare in a number of ways, as well as taking the necessary time to understand what families need. That takes us directly to the work that is under way in the childcare early adopter communities, which support more than 20 communities. Different approaches are being taken in those areas, depending on locality, because we know that those local areas know what their families need most. For example, some areas are taking an approach that focuses on providing childcare for younger children, and some are taking an approach that is trying to increase benefit maximisation. We know that the universal credit childcare element and the tax-free childcare element are extremely underutilised. In some of those areas, there has been a real focus on trying to get more families signed up to the money that they are entitled to receive. It is important to look to that wider childcare offer and, as I said, a number of different approaches are under way in the early adopter communities,.
Mr McLennan will be aware that we have ensured another £50 million in the budget for whole family wellbeing funding, in addition to £50 million for whole family support. That relates the First Minister’s priority of providing wraparound support for families in their local areas. I am confident that it all comes back to the prevention agenda that we have been discussing all morning; I am confident, too, that we are investing in the right ways. The ELC policy is a preventative move to provide young children with the early learning that they need and ensure that families can take up employment opportunities.
There are a number of other aspects to whole family wellbeing, such as the investment of more than £100 million, which is a really positive move.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Natalie Don-Innes
I cannot comment on individual cases. However, a child might have family or friends in Scotland, or they might need to be away from a certain area or certain people. I cannot account for all the different reasons why a child might be placed—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Natalie Don-Innes
Work is being undertaken in England to ensure the capacity of their own sector. For example, I met the relevant minister yesterday to discuss cross-border placements, among other things. He told me about several initiatives that are being carried out in England. One of those is the regional care partnerships—sorry, I might need to come back to the committee with the official term for that—which is a new initiative to try to ensure capacity in England. As Mr Rennie will remember from when I have been in committee to talk about placements into secure care, the number of those placements has reduced over time. That is a result of a lot of the cross-border work that is going on.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Natalie Don-Innes
No such issue been brought to my attention. I am not sure whether officials could elaborate on that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Natalie Don-Innes
Yes. It would be the placing authority’s responsibility, but, through the planning and discussions that would take place in advance, such an arrangement could be worked out. There would be conversations around what would be best suited to the individual child’s circumstances. Perhaps Louisa Brown can help with that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Natalie Don-Innes
The timeframe of six-weekly visits is in place, but there may be legitimate reasons why it might not be possible to adhere to that. That is not to allow authorities to say, “Oh, we just didn’t have time to do that.” It could be down to, for example, a social worker being off ill that week or something else having come about to prevent that visit. However, the regulations require that, if the visit cannot go ahead, it must be arranged as soon as possible after the six-week mark.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Natalie Don-Innes
There was an update. With regard to the timeframe for that child going without education, I would have to pass that to my officials.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Natalie Don-Innes
The draft regulations specify the information that is to be contained in the notification and the people who must receive it, including key partners such as those in health and education departments, residential or fostering contacts, the chief social work officer and the Care Inspectorate.
When notification takes place, because it has not previously happened, I would expect conversations to happen around what will be required for that child. The purpose of bringing forward the draft regulations is entirely to enable us to understand the needs of children who are placed in Scotland and how we can best support them.
Although I appreciate that there is no duty there, the fact that all those partners are involved in the child’s care and support services should bring about confidence in relation to how that child will be supported.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Natalie Don-Innes
That would have to be considered before it was agreed where the child was going to be placed, because we would have to consider whether those services were available for that child. If there was going to be a barrier to that child accessing certain services, that placement would probably not be in the best interests of that child. The consideration of where that child should be placed should happen before the notification.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Natalie Don-Innes
Good morning. Happy new year to everyone. I hope that you had a nice break.
I am very pleased to introduce draft regulations that ensure legal recognition of orders and arrangements for children who are on temporary cross-border placements in care homes and foster care in Scotland. I put on record that the draft regulations are not intended to be a substitute for suitable placements of children being available in their home nations. I am also clear that cross-border placements should occur only in exceptional circumstances when it is in the best interests of a child.
Our intention is to ensure that, when such placements are necessary, they are appropriately considered and assessed and subject to a clear regulatory framework. We have heard that, for many placements in residential care homes in Scotland, local services often know very little about the placed child or their circumstances. Indeed, they sometimes only find out about a placement during a crisis. New notification requirements aim to ensure that that does not happen in the future.
We have heard that children are sometimes placed in settings or services that are not fully equipped to meet their needs. The draft regulations aim to address those concerns by requiring policing authorities to assess the suitability in advance.
Additional conditions are to be met for cross-border placements into residential care homes, including regular visits and placement reviews. Those conditions aim to address concerns that we have heard: that those who are involved in the child’s care in Scotland are frequently not included in existing review processes and that visits might be infrequent. For children who are placed into residential care homes and are subject to deprivation of liberty orders, the order must be reviewed at least every three months to ensure necessity and proportionality.
Again, for cross-border fostering placements, the draft regulations will require placement suitability to be considered in advance and for those with an interest in the child’s care to be notified of the placement. They aim to build on existing practice by requiring that a fostering agreement is in place before the placement starts, in order to cover issues such as arrangements for visits and reviews.
Although most cross-border placements into Scotland are temporary arrangements, there are some limited circumstances in which it could be appropriate for a child to be brought into the Scottish system. For example, if a child’s family relocates to Scotland, the relevant Scottish local authority may agree to take over their care. Those types of permanent transfer have been possible since 2013, and the regulations will preserve them while bringing all the rules on cross-border placements into one place.
I am happy to take any questions that members may have.